Readit NewsWe had an all-hands meeting recently. The message was essentially, "We have heard your feedback that most of you don't like this, but WE like it, so it's staying."
...and they say the slippery slope is a fallacy
Tree style tabs is the main reason I've used firefox since.
Tabs are really a bad design, maybe made some sense with 4:3 monitors but text was horizontal back then too.
But even then, any advanced CAD software is not the type of soft software that you can open and "figure out".
I'm learning it because on linux desktop there's not much else but it's a joke for professionals.
I never liked Postman and that's how I mostly stopped using it. Completely stops working on analytics request denial and then starts sending reports to Sentry (but even if you allow those, they don't learn, I've tried)
I bet many people don't ever use those PCs but in 2 places (home, work)
https://www.drive.com.au/news/the-best-selling-cars-around-t...
A 50K€ base model car as top 1 is a pipe dream. It'll happen when people can't buy cars anymore and all remains is the rich and robotaxis.
You simply shouldn't be allowed to sell any digital license for a product you didn't register at that clearinghouse before. The task of that clearinghouse would be to provide the customer with the bought content in case of dispute or any other problems. So if, e.g, Amazon goes out of business, all my books would be available for me to download from said clearinghouse because I own the license. Same for steam games or Disney videos.
Many (but not all) of the problems with DRM or copyrighted works would vanish if we established this legal requirement.
Making virtually unlimited profit on a limited initial amount of time, labour, costs is what's evil here. "X number of years" argument will never solve it (the shorter the worst the hype push will get).
Should be capped by a function of said time, labour invested plus costs and allowed profit adjusted for inflation.
I don't care how much one thinks he deserves to milk such work/invention. Look at what Nikola Tesla gave us and what he got in return.
https://github.com/obsidianmd/obsidian-api/blob/master/canva...
Just like all other files in Obsidian, canvas files are your own and local to your device. You're still linking to your own Markdown files which are just as future-proof as ever.
We decided to create the .canvas format because there wasn't any pre-existing canvas-type format we could find that fit our priorities around longevity, readability, interoperability and extensibility.
The .canvas format is designed to be as easy to parse as possible. We've already seen a few plugins take advantage of it, and we hope that more tools will become available that can use the .canvas format.
Does this look OK? https://i.postimg.cc/4ymyHWxF/window-border.png
BTW isn't "Elimination" kind of vionent as a term? I wish they used a less upsetting name.
In any case, by upvoting this you are providing visibility to nonsense.
Except that I've met lots of engineers who were the opposite. They hate greenfield projects and prefer maintaining existing code. I noticed this broad division of personality early in my career. And it's a great thing -- both sorts of engineers are critical to a successful project.