Readit News logoReadit News
ratboy666 commented on I Like Makefiles   switowski.com/blog/i-like... · Posted by u/thunderbong
kstenerud · a year ago
Makefiles are terrible tech. The problem is that they're slightly less bad than most other build system we've come up with, which makes them "useful" in a masochistic way.

Build systems tend to commit one or more of the following sins:

* Too basic: Once you try to build anything beyond a toy, it quickly becomes chaos.

* Too complicated: The upfront required knowledge, bureaucracy, synchronization and boilerplate is ridiculous. The build system itself takes an order of magnitude more data and memory than the build target.

* No standard library (or a substandard one that does things poorly or not at all): You must define everything yourself, leading to 10000 different incompatible implementations of the same build patterns. So now no one can just dive in and know what they're doing.

* Too constricting: The interface wasn't built as a simple layer upon an expert layer. So now as soon as your needs evolve, you have to migrate away.

* Too much magic: The hallmark of a poorly designed system. It doesn't have to be turtles all the way down, but it should be relatively close with few exceptions.

* Cryptic or inconsistent syntax.

ratboy666 · a year ago
Yep, terrible:

I will show how Make hits every one of your complaints:

(sarcasm on)

in file hello.c:

  #include <stdio.h>
  int main(int ac, char **av) { printf("hello\n"); return 0; }
How to compile and run this? We need a build system! Download and install GNU Make.

When that step is complete:

Type in

make hello

and its done. Now, run via ./hello

See, Too much magic (didn't even have a makefile or Makefile), no standard library, Too constricting, cryptic, too basic. And, because you had to install Make, too complicated. Hits every one of your objections.

(sarcasm off)

ratboy666 commented on Linksys Velop routers send Wi-Fi passwords in plaintext to US servers   stackdiary.com/linksys-ve... · Posted by u/skilled
abadpoli · 2 years ago
> But the experience of using a speical-purpose WiFi network is janky on many common devices so I understand not taking that choice.

Yea, this is my hunch as well as to why this works this way. Consumers are easily confused, and asking them to disconnect from their currently working internet connect and connect to a router that hasn’t yet been set up (and might not be able to provide an internet connection) can get confusing. I know I’ve been in this situation before where I’ve been connected to a special-purpose network without internet connect, need to look up some instructions online, but then remember I can’t because I’m not connected to the internet…

ratboy666 · 2 years ago
The velop uses bluetooth for setup... you use an application on your phone, that sets up the router. Yes, it's janky too.
ratboy666 commented on The Cheapest NAS   sigwait.org/~alex/blog/20... · Posted by u/henry_flower
mafro · 2 years ago
Why would one snapshot help?
ratboy666 · 2 years ago
One snapshot would help because, if EVERYTHING collapses, and you need data recovery, the snapshot provides a basepoint for the recovery. This should allow better recovery of metadata. Not that this should EVER happen -- it is just a good idea. I use Jim Salter's syncoid/sanoid to make snapshots, age them out, and send data to another pool.

I agree that ECC is a damn good idea - I use it on my home server. But, my lappy (i5 thinkpad) doesn't have it.

ratboy666 commented on The Cheapest NAS   sigwait.org/~alex/blog/20... · Posted by u/henry_flower
EvanAnderson · 2 years ago
Unless you've verified hashes of your files over time you may be having problems and not realizing it.
ratboy666 · 2 years ago
They did mention ZFS, so verified hashes of each file block. I hope they are scrubbing, and have at least one snapshot.
ratboy666 commented on Zany ideas to slow polar melting are gathering momentum   economist.com/science-and... · Posted by u/Brajeshwar
ratboy666 · 2 years ago
That much sea level rise?

From New York: https://psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/12.php

From Stockholm: https://psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/78.php

Simple: New York is sinking slowly. Stockhold is rising. Especially since the effects are pretty much linear 1880 to present.

ratboy666 commented on How to copy a file from a 30-year-old laptop   unterminated.com/random-f... · Posted by u/tfvlrue
wizzwizz4 · 2 years ago
Denoising algorithms are always lossy. An LLM (or, y'know, Markov chain) could do this job by exploiting statistical regularities in the English language, but a hex dump isn't quite the English language, so it'd be completely useless. Even if this text were English, though, the LLM would make opinionated edits (e.g. twiddling the punctuation): you'd be unlikely to get a faithful reproduction out the other end.
ratboy666 · 2 years ago
Of course, use search and replace to change 0 to zero... etc. The OCR will (should) work better.
ratboy666 commented on History of Antarctica revealed in octopus DNA   science.org/content/artic... · Posted by u/pseudolus
defrost · 2 years ago
You might want to read the summary for policy makers

https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6...

Start with A: Observed Warming and its Causes and move onto b: B. Future Climate Change, Risks, and Long-Term Responses

C02 increases directly increase trapped solar heating.

There are other gases and other factors.

Re: GP comment

* Is Dutton making the claim that emissions are the cause now?

The journalist writing the Science article alludes to the fact that now (present time) Antartic sheet loss is being driven by warming oceans caused by greenhouse gas increases. With no quote marks it's unclear what Dutton had to say on this.

* I'll accept all of Dutton's claims, except that one; there is no basis for that claim.

It's not apparent that is a claim that Dutton made.

* Lower the chance of another collapse? By how much?

See IPCC reports.

* Would that have actually helped 100,000 years ago?

No. Actions taken today would not alter past history.

It's also not the case that ice sheet collapse 100K years ago was related to human or animal gas emissions, unlike today.

* I make the claim that Dutton is suffering from hubris.

You're free to do that. It's not a convincing claim.

ratboy666 · 2 years ago
Either the journalist writing the article was using Dutton as a source accurately, or Science is not a reputable source of news. This is mutually exclusive.

I took the story prima facie. And, if the story (journalism) is accurate, Dutton is indeed suffering from hubris. Someone brought up the collapse 100,000 year ago in a direct comparison. It was either Dutton or the journalist. If I take Science as an accurate source, it was Dutton. Or it was not Dutton, then Science is not reputable (are they adding implications and misquotes?). If that is the case, why the HN story? HN curated it (that is, HN readers) so I have to give credence to Science magazine (because I give credence "to the crowd of HN contributors"). Again, both sides cannot be argued at the same time.

As to reading the summary for policy makers: the IPCC is a political organization, not a scientific one. Why would its publications that are for policy makers be of interest to me? I need a condensed version of science, not policy. The IPCC doesn't have anything to do with the claim -- (except CO2 causes global warming which the IPCC doesn't actually claim, but does imply, as best as I can tell). Either Dutton made the claim, or Science made the claim -- they have to back it up and defend it. I made no claim EXCEPT that Dutton is suffering from hubris. Which I just backed up and defended.

ratboy666 commented on History of Antarctica revealed in octopus DNA   science.org/content/artic... · Posted by u/pseudolus
wredue · 2 years ago
There are indeed multiple sources of emissions, many not at all needing human intervention at all.

Luckily, we can generally measure natural emissions vs human emissions and find how much of it is being caused by us. Incidentally, due to where various gasses are trapped, many natural looking emissions are still our fault, this is frequently discussed in talks and papers about runaway climate change (note that I mean talks and papers from scientific authorities, not Facebook and fox)

ratboy666 · 2 years ago
You claim that CO2 causes runaway climate change?
ratboy666 commented on History of Antarctica revealed in octopus DNA   science.org/content/artic... · Posted by u/pseudolus
twoWhlsGud · 2 years ago
You drive a car of type Model Z. Someone, looking at a crash of a Model Z which was going 50 mph, discovers a design flaw that is particularly acute when the car is driven faster than 70. Do you:

* adjust your driving behavior in accordance with whatever bayesian impact the new data has?

* psychoanalyze the person doing the research, or decide that nothing that happens at 50 mph could tell you something about the behavior at 70 to reassure yourself you can ignore the new data?

Your call...

ratboy666 · 2 years ago
I do wish that was a reasonable argument. Closer: I drive a "Model Z". In the past, someone discovered a crushed Model Z. Does driving a Model Z more than 50 mph cause crushing?
ratboy666 commented on History of Antarctica revealed in octopus DNA   science.org/content/artic... · Posted by u/pseudolus
mistrial9 · 2 years ago
the warning is - yes, oceans were 10 meters higher, not long ago..
ratboy666 · 2 years ago
To quote the article:

"The new octopus genome data, she adds, “is pretty convincing evidence that a full collapse happened.” The findings reinforce the importance of understanding how modern climate conditions are affecting the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, Dutton says. “This is telling us that we need to take this bigger picture seriously.” Continued ocean warming—driven by greenhouse gas emissions—could destabilize the submerged portion of the ice sheet. To lower the chance of another collapse, she says, “We can’t just kick the can down the road and wait to make emissions cuts for another 5 years, another 10 years. It really demands that we do it now.”

Emissions in the modern sense were not the cause of this. But, it happened. Is Dutton making the claim that emissions are the cause now? I'll accept all of Dutton's claims, except that one; there is no basis for that claim. Lower the chance of another collapse? By how much? Would that have actually helped 100,000 years ago? I make the claim that Dutton is suffering from hubris.

u/ratboy666

KarmaCake day226May 17, 2013View Original