We might as well blame all the fat people as well. If they were thinner we’d have saved lives.
We might as well blame all the fat people as well. If they were thinner we’d have saved lives.
No doubt some in the government wanted to attack, no different than you could find who want to attack Iran in today's government, but it's not the US government's position. FDR was definitely more interested in getting involved internationally, but the Republicans were staunchly isolationist.
The comparison to Russia and Ukraine is there. Russia preemptively attacked Ukraine because it wanted to prevent NATO from getting a foothold in it's sphere of influence. Japan considering the Pacific Ocean and namely the resources in South East Asian there's, so preemptively attacked the US to prevent it from opposing it's control over the Pacific.
They were except for their nominee running against FDR in 1940. His interventionist stance (and otherwise complete lack of political experience) made FDRs victory all but assured.
I’m not sure how you have a base so aligned on a topic that gives them an excellent chance on defeating the incumbent nominate a political nobody who holds a dissenting opinion. The same nobody who went on to serve in FDRs administration.
- The Tiananmen Square demonstrations. (1989)[1] At least in China.
- Britain's efforts to get the US into WWII before Pearl Harbor. (early 1940s) [2]
- DuPont's attempt at a US coup (1933) [3]
- The Israeli nuclear bomb test. (1979) [4]
The first one is a successful outright suppression. The rest were obfuscated and obscured at the time, but the historical record exists.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests...
[2] https://www.history.com/news/wwii-us-entry-secret-british-ca...
The only truths taught in US schools are those beneficial to the empire - it's best viewed as propaganda.
I have never had a flu shot, and also never had the flu in over thirty years. I just don't see why I should get myself sick to risk not getting sick(er)? Anytime I mention this people call me antivax.
I was never skeptical about taking shots until the way the government handled covid. There is no chance I will take something that hasn't been thoroughly tested and proven to actually work the way our standard immunization schedule does.
Nobody has been held accountable for coercing (and worse) the US population based on bad data. I don't see any reason to trust the government going forward.
Going to say it again: feudal power structures are no way to organize 21st century business. Time for people (_especially_ young people) to consider alternative arrangements like worker co-ops. If you're not an owner with a real decision-making vote, you're on the menu for these guys.
The efficiency gains and - more importantly - resiliency gained by having a single leader with a strong vision are enormous and the reason a single ruler is so prominent among humans. Democracy is weak to balkanization and demagoguery.
That being said the real issue here is corrupt elites - which no system can fix. The blast radius from a bad ruler is much worse than bad actors amongst a democratic system, but the potential gains from a single ruler are much higher.
Dead Comment
The book follows an American family who gave birth to 12 children, 6 of whom were later diagnosed with schizophrenia in their teens.
It’s interesting because the book gives lots of insight into the historical to modern research on the condition. In the past psychologists thought schizophrenia was caused by the environment and/or bad childhood. But most of the research right now is pointing towards a genetic cause.
I hope this isn’t taken the wrong way - id very much like to know if my genetic ancestry made me more or less susceptible to things like schizophrenia.
The average life expectancy by race is:
Asian: 86.3
Hispanic: 82.0
White: 78.6
Native: 77.4
Black: 75.0
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_health_in_the_United_...
Additionally, why is it framed in a way that makes it seem like white people having more of an impact is a bad thing?
10 years ago if you'd told me articles like this were coming I'd have laughed. How did misconstruing the truth to further the "white people bad" notion become not just acceptable but popular? And it doesn't even stop there - the article implies that more diversity (i.e less white people) is an ontological good. How does this stuff even get published?