If the mechanic was reselling the real parts on eBay and instead using shoddy parts, everyone would agree on criminal liability.
If the CEO and leadership are also cutting corners and destroying a safety culture for money, and endangering the public, that is also criminal.
In addition yeah also prosecute criminals. But that doesn’t stop crime. See “war on drugs” for example.
I feel culturally American now though and huge part of that is feeling alienated, pressured and ridiculed when back in the UK because of my refusal of alcohol.
I don’t even talk about it or ‘holier than thou’ about it or even care at all about others drinking but many people back there see it as a personal insult if I choose not to drink. Even if i sneak a Shandy or 0% beer.
So weird to me now but I was fully part of that culture until aged 28. I even remember ‘jokingly’ bullying people into drinking to excess.
I’m now 46 and have been in the USA since 2005 full time.
Three older relatives died of liver disease.
I met one uncle at the pub last month.
He’s yellow.
I used to drink a lot more, but now I find it hard to stand. No buzz just the stupification.
And of course drink is very toxic and will set back all your other goals from good sex, to muscles, weight loss and cognitive function.
And then you shot her, correct?!
Answer: No I did not shoot her! I never did that.
And your lawyer knows it is a lie that you indeed did shoot her, it could be problematic at that point, depending on some jurisdiction.
I guess it depends if you think an effective defense should allow the guilty to go free?
Say someone says to their lawyer they shot the person but really they are covering for their wife even to mthe lawyer. The lawyer then hears them say in court they didn’t shoot (the truth) but the lawyer just knows they are saying something different now to what they said before. It could be that.
There is a kernel of an exception that is almost not worth mentioning. The Rules of Professional
Conduct 3.3 obligates me with the duty of candor. I am not allowed to present evidence that I “know”
is false, which encompasses witness testimony. Some jurisdictions make exceptions to this rule for
defendants testifying in their criminal trial (correctly, IMO) but not all. So assuming that a
client truthfully confesses to me, assuming we go to trial, assuming they decide to testify, and
assuming I “know” they’re going to lie, then yes, this could indeed spawn a very awkward situation
where I’m forced to withdraw in the middle of proceedings.
I would argue that not supporting folders or many other file operations make something not a filesystem today.
The question is how long. Doing intense stuff needs breaks.