Readit News logoReadit News

Deleted Comment

Deleted Comment

quandrum commented on New York Times Tech Guild goes on strike   washingtonpost.com/style/... · Posted by u/ChrisArchitect
stogot · a year ago
What makes you think they don’t have that?
quandrum · a year ago
Because the union is striking over it
quandrum commented on New York Times Tech Guild goes on strike   washingtonpost.com/style/... · Posted by u/ChrisArchitect
stickfigure · a year ago
> workers can be terminated only for misconduct or another such reason

This is such a weird request for technology workers. You want to work with low-performing coworkers?

quandrum · a year ago
No, I want management to develop a system to determine who is low-performing, document when those workers don't meet the standards of performance, and reference those documents when they fire someone.

It's just asking for due process.

quandrum commented on New York Times Tech Guild goes on strike   washingtonpost.com/style/... · Posted by u/ChrisArchitect
infecto · a year ago
Just cause feels like a stretch. Is that common in a lot of employment contracts? Feels like one of those rules that sounds like it could make sense but in reality it does not play out and you get this weird cohort of unproductive employees that you can never get rid of.
quandrum · a year ago
Due process for employment is probably more important than fair pay in most union contracts.

Your argument is in fact that exact same one that was used to argue against due process in legal proceedings. "In reality it doesn't play out and you get this group of criminals running free on legal technicalities."

If you are in a union shop and have a large contingent of unproductive employees, it happens for the same reason as non-union shops. You have bad management. Just Cause is almost entirely asking management to do a little paperwork and a little planning, things that are supposed to be their job anyway.

Deleted Comment

quandrum commented on MIT abandons requirement of DEI statements for hiring and promotions   whyevolutionistrue.com/20... · Posted by u/nsoonhui
2OEH8eoCRo0 · 2 years ago
DEI is a strange issue in that nearly everybody agrees that it's a good target to aim for yet any action taken to get there is discrimination.

I frankly see it as a cheap shortcut that some very privileged people want to take to try to wash away the sins of our racist past, not to help people, but to make ourselves feel better- or attempt to.

quandrum · 2 years ago
I think DEI as implemented is worse than this. It’s a calculated, prepared defense against the possibility of future bigoted behavior.

Corporate America (which increasingly includes universities whose primary business is endowment investment) don’t just want to wash away our past, they want to ensure they can keep operating business as usual.

DEI is insurance. Yeah the bad thing may happen but we paid for it before hand so we are insulated against further repercussions.

quandrum commented on Humans now share the web equally with bots   independent.co.uk/tech/de... · Posted by u/belter
quandrum · 2 years ago
One thing I worry about is how normalized this will be for children and countries without regular internet access as they get regular internet access (or even have had it for a while: the report from OP states that 71 percent of traffic on Irish sites are bots).

The experience of the internet will be bots and because the usefulness of the medium isn't going away, they will keep using it. Everything being bots will be normal.

At some point things like ubiquitous ads, smog, light pollution or dozens of corporate microphones in our house was something humans first started experiencing and having trepidations about. Then it got normalized. Sometimes we fixed it like smog or CFCs and sometimes it became one the largest sectors of our economy (ads). Statistically, it seems more likely that dead internet is here to stay

Deleted Comment

quandrum commented on Sunlight and Vitamin D (2013)   ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti... · Posted by u/luu
klipt · 2 years ago
The genes that predispose you to melanoma are probably the same genes that makes your skin white...
quandrum · 2 years ago
You have it reversed. The color of your skin determines how much UV protection you get. Skin color is 1-1 correlation to the average hours of daylight a population experiences. High melanin skin is required to live in the equatorial regions to prevent over exposure to UV rays. Low melanin skin is required in the northern regions to prevent under exposure to UV rays.

We saw a mass migration of eastern Europeans to the middle east mid 20th century and the result was the catastrophic increase in skin cancer rates.

We saw a mass migration of middle Easterners to great lakes region in the same period and we saw a catastrophic increase in depression rates.

u/quandrum

KarmaCake day513December 17, 2010View Original