Readit News logoReadit News
qqii commented on Every employee who leaves Apple becomes an ‘associate’   washingtonpost.com/techno... · Posted by u/semiquaver
redler · 4 years ago
Since it will be widely known among peer organizations that Apple has this policy, the presence or absence of the "Associate" title achieves this, in effect, does it not? I think it's unlikely someone seeking a 600K job will be mistaken for having been a retail employee.
qqii · 4 years ago
I'd argue that false data doesn't achieve this, it just confuses everything. Using an analogy in programming terms, it would be like `job_title <- Maybe "NULL"` whereas they really ment `job_title <- Nothing`.
qqii commented on Every employee who leaves Apple becomes an ‘associate’   washingtonpost.com/techno... · Posted by u/semiquaver
Spoom · 4 years ago
This was my first thought. Apple is notoriously secretive, even internally. They likely see this as a way to prevent folks from reverse engineering through job titles what former employees were working on. (Agreed that it's super shitty and likely overkill, but I think this is a better explanation than outright trying to screw former employees.)

In this case, though, why not replace the job title with "Employee"?

qqii · 4 years ago
Exactly, or expulge and refuse to provide job titles? That begs the question, why do they provide this information to third parties anyway?
qqii commented on Every employee who leaves Apple becomes an ‘associate’   washingtonpost.com/techno... · Posted by u/semiquaver
sprayk · 4 years ago
(Just to throat clear ahead of time... I obviously find what Apple is doing super shitty. I just want to find some reason besides "Apple bad" for why they would do this.)

Could they be doing this title change, at least in theory, as an information security measure? Competitors and journalists could potentially corroborate (or have an easier time corroborating) leaks if they can verify that a former employee is the position/level they claim to be.

I worked briefly at Apple as contractor doing some professional services integration type stuff in the datacenter space, and one thing that struck me was how secrecy seemed to ooze it's way into super unexpected places. This was to the point that I wondered if an infosec team had a hand in designing some of the systems I was working with that were way closer to the power lines than they were to the products they were designing. This was also around the time that I was reading about Apple's "Worldwide Loyalty Team" and how they would plan operations to catch people leaking.

As an aside, does anyone know how accurate the reporting was/is on the "Worldwide Loyalty Team"? Looking back it seems absurd, to the point where it makes more sense to me as a myth than fact.

qqii · 4 years ago
If it is for secrecy then why not delete the information and inform those who ask they do not hold such information? The issue was the discrepancy when a third party tried to verify, and I'm sure third parties would quickly learn to work around the fact?

Instead making everyone associates is like an error propagating far from it's call site until an exception (this article) is raised.

Deleted Comment

qqii commented on Why can't you reverse a string with a flag emoji?   davidamos.dev/why-cant-yo... · Posted by u/da12
qqii · 4 years ago
> Challenge: How would you go about writing a function that reverses a string while leaving symbols encoded as sequences of code points intact? Can you do it from scratch? Is there a package available in your language that can do it for you? How did that package solve the problem?

So are there any good libraries that can deal with code points that are merged together into a single pictographic and reverse them "as expected"?

qqii commented on BLAKE2: “Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger” Than MD5 (2014)   leastauthority.com/blog/b... · Posted by u/0xedb
staticassertion · 4 years ago
Yes. He chose to design his system with no ability to migrate and use a hash algorithm that was already known to be flawed.

https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2017-Februar...

qqii · 4 years ago
From the threat it looks like Linus' threat model for git is simply different from the common use today. Of course a judgement under a different threat model would make it seem like a bad tradeoff!
qqii commented on Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals   crypto.com/product-news/c... · Posted by u/codechicago277
ouid · 4 years ago
I'm confused. Ostensibly the tradeoff for crypto is that only you know the secret factors that allow you to spend money, but there is no possibility of reversing a fraudulent transaction. If you give the keys to someone else, you lose the first condition, which was the benefit, but keep the second condition, which was the drawback. There was no reason to give anyone anyone else your keys!
qqii · 4 years ago
There's no reason you cannot construct a token that can be frozen and reversed - USDT (other issues as side) being an example. Accounts as we know them don't have to be at the level of public address-private key but rather a smart contract as seen by Loopring.

The difference is what was centralised is now decentralised, what was implicit and required trust is now explicit and requires formal verification.

qqii commented on Does Not Translate   doesnottranslate.com/... · Posted by u/renameme
timeon · 4 years ago
qqii · 4 years ago
Thank you.
qqii commented on Does Not Translate   doesnottranslate.com/... · Posted by u/renameme
qqii · 4 years ago
Having checked my own language I'd describe the list not as being unable to translated outright, but of susinct ideas that are not normally expressed in English.

A literal or detailed and contextful translation does not express the same "feeling" as in the native tongue, which you could argue as a what is impossible to translate.

qqii · 4 years ago
Also, taking the website name literally leads to a very boring time. If we define translatable as having a surjection between languages then many commenters have shown examples of even the most difficult to translate phrases explained in a blog or article.

Instead the subreddit's description[0] is a far better description, and the discussion on each phrase about possible translations or similar ideas in different languages is a lot of fun!

[0]: Post quirky and niche words/phrases from foreign languages that can't easily be translated.

u/qqii

KarmaCake day710July 27, 2016
About
Mainly interested in having interesting conversations.

PMs via reddit, at the same username. Or find me elsewhere.

View Original