Readit News logoReadit News
pervycreeper commented on But why is a sphere's surface area four times its shadow? [video]   youtube.com/watch?v=GNcFj... · Posted by u/espeed
rocqua · 7 years ago
In fact, the video states this for all convex shapes.

I've been trying something similar for 2D, but there it doesn't quite seem to hold.

Consider a very thin rectangle of size 1 by epsilon. Then it has circumference 2 (ignoring the epsilon). The shadow it casts at angle phi has size |sin phi|. Now, if we average |sin phi| from 0 to 180 degrees, (or 0 to 360 or 0 to 90) we get (2 / pi).

I haven't checked whether this average holds for things other than thin rectangles, but I'd imagine so. I then find it weird we get a trancendental number in 2D but an integer in 3D.

pervycreeper · 7 years ago
Not a surprise to see pi in there really, since we're averaging over "surfaces" of circles/spheres. In general (spoiler), it does generalize to arbitrary dimensions. We get a rational factor for odd dimensions, and 1/pi * rational for even.

See sections 6-9 here for demonstration: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1109.0595.pdf

pervycreeper commented on Going to university does not broaden the mind   economist.com/science-and... · Posted by u/godelmachine
jedberg · 7 years ago
University definitely broadened my mind. I grew up in an area that was 99+% white and 50+% Jewish. We literally had “the black family” with twins who were our top track stars. And a few Asian families who hid their Asianness.

It was at University that I learned about Asian culture. It was the first time I used chopsticks. It was the first time I drank tea without sugar. It was the first time I ate Chinese food that wasn’t deep fried. It was the first time I had dim sum. I learned to understand people with heavy accents (it was the first time I’d ever met someone for whom English was a second language). It was where I learned the diffence between Chinese (north and south), Vietnamese, Korean, and Japanese people.

It was also the first time I ever met someone who was home schooled, someone who a lesbian or pretty much anyone who wasn’t straight, other than the one openly gay kid in high school.

It was the first time I learned that making racist and homophobic jokes was not ok.

It was the first time I learned the girls can write code.

Without college I would probably be a racist and not believe that social programs are necessary.

pervycreeper · 7 years ago
Such an experience could be described as the replacement of one ideology with another, rather than an increase in personality trait openness.
pervycreeper commented on Indigenous women kept from seeing their newborns until agreeing to sterilization   cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/t... · Posted by u/DyslexicAtheist
pervycreeper · 7 years ago
The key "says lawyer" portion of the headline is missing in the title.
pervycreeper commented on Improving Ourselves to Death   newyorker.com/magazine/20... · Posted by u/Futurebot
viridian · 7 years ago
Ironically I think Ms. Schwartz could stand to improve her writing, and be more productive with her audience's time. I gave up 7 long paragraphs in, after realizing that:

a) no real counterclaim had been made yet, and b) I was only 1/4 of the way through this article

Her concluding paragraph is that you should do non-productive tasks sometimes, disconnect, and enjoy yourself. The great irony in this is that I recall being given the same advice in the last couple of self help books I read, Deep Work and The Shallows.

This article seems to be a mountain of words to broad brush a genre, but then I could be wrong, as I only read a quarter of it.

pervycreeper · 7 years ago
The title instantly identifies it as belonging to the genre of vacuous contrarian hot-takes. Without having read it in its entirety either, I would guess that if does make a good point, it relies on confusing the dangers of bad info, excessive application, or selective focus on areas for improvement, for detriments of the enterprise of self-improvement itself.

Deleted Comment

pervycreeper commented on Transferring GitHub stars   francisco.io/blog/transfe... · Posted by u/franciscop
pervycreeper · 7 years ago
This requires owning both repositories. The user puts a measure of "trust" in the owner whose repository he had starred already, so this seems more like a violation of that trust rather than an "exploit".
pervycreeper commented on New North American Trade Deal Has Bad News for Canadian Copyright   eff.org/deeplinks/2018/10... · Posted by u/DiabloD3
mwfunk · 7 years ago
Agreed 100%. The likes of the EFF are at a huge natural disadvantage because nobody stands to profit from rationally curtailing copyright. Groups like the EFF are literally just trying to do the ethically right thing for everyone (at least in their eyes and mine), and it costs them money to do so, money that comes almost entirely from donations (I think). Whereas those pushing for copyright extensions not only have their own revenue stream, they actually stand to profit from the results of their lobbying.

The EFF has to spend money they don’t have to fight for their beliefs, but the copyright extension people likely make a net profit over time fighting for their own interests. It’s like a negative sum game- the net result is worse for almost everyone to a greater degree than it benefits a few. If money played no role in politicians’ decision making, those decisions would be much more rational and responsible. For all I know, maybe most of them would still support copyright extensions, but it would at least be because in their judgement it was the right thing for the American people. The ridiculous amount of money in American politics muddies the waters and forces all participants into moral hazards and perpetual conflicts of interest.

pervycreeper · 7 years ago
>nobody stands to profit from rationally curtailing copyright

Except, of course, nearly everybody.

pervycreeper commented on An Elaborate Academic-Journal Hoax   chronicle.com/article/Sok... · Posted by u/lukev
pervycreeper · 7 years ago
I've noticed a lot of hair-splitting in these comments over whether this was a failure of peer review, whether to call the papers, considered as specimens of scholarship in their appropriate fields, "fraudulent" rather than "bad", or whether the number of hours they actually logged at the dog park is a relevant concern. All of this is quite besides the point. The researchers passed a version of the Turing Test among the reviewers of their papers. All that we need from that point is an acknowledgement of the absurdity and falseness of the papers themselves. This may not be easily forthcoming, though. One of the reviewers of Social Text took the position, in the wake of Sokal's hoax, that his paper constituted good scholarship, despite the stated intentions of its author. Also confer with Poe's Law. However, when we admit this as a possible response, we are in the territory of radical relativism, with no way to adjudicate between the claims of these scholars and their critics, and for that matter, those of religious fanatics, mentally ill delusional people, confidence scammers, or indeed anybody at all. This is a position which seems, at least, to be somewhat at odds with the fundamental scholarly enterprise. At its heart, one has to cross the pons arsinorum of admitting that, yes, the papers are indeed absurd nonsense. At this point, it seems impossible to convince some people to take this step.

If the critics's objections could be distilled into something with a semblance of validity and germaneness, then it would be that the researchers's methods were too unfocused. But had they taken a narrower approach, the response could just have been to rationalize and ignore. Fight fire with fire (being generality, in this case).

pervycreeper commented on An Elaborate Academic-Journal Hoax   chronicle.com/article/Sok... · Posted by u/lukev
TheCoelacanth · 7 years ago
The point of peer review is to stop bad research, not fake research. The reviewers are supposed to make sure that the methods used to acquire the data are clearly documented and that the conclusions drawn from the data follow from the data that was collected.

They can't verify that the data collected actually was collected without literally watching over the shoulder of the researcher while the researcher was collecting it, which is obviously not feasible. A researcher actively trying to deceive the reviewer with fake data but with a good method for collecting that data and analysis of the data that would be correct if the data were real is not something that should be caught by a reviewer. That should be caught by someone reproducing the research after publication.

pervycreeper · 7 years ago
>The point of peer review is to stop bad research, not fake research

I would submit that "fake research" is, in fact, bad research.

pervycreeper commented on Cern scientist: 'Physics built by men – not by invitation'   bbc.co.uk/news/world-euro... · Posted by u/ksajadi
simonrobb · 7 years ago
It's not the right forum to express this evidence/conclusions. It's insensitive, and entirely without empathy. People have good reason to be upset.
pervycreeper · 7 years ago
Can you specify an appropriate forum in which he could have presented his findings to the public without upsetting anyone?

u/pervycreeper

KarmaCake day1694April 23, 2012
About
I take pleasure in debunking; more from being proven wrong.
View Original