I was deeply involved in prompt engineering and writing custom prompts because they yielded significantly better results.
However it became tedious especially since each update seemed to alter the way to effectively direct ChatGPT’s attention.
Nowadays I occasionally use a custom ChatGPT but I mostly stick with stock ChatGPT.
I feel the difference in quality has diminished.
The results are sufficiently good and more importantly the response time with larger prompts has increased so much that I prefer quicker ‘good enough’ responses over slower superior ones.
It’s easier to ask a follow-up question if the initial result isn’t quite there yet rather than striving for a perfect response in a single attempt
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom%27s_taxonomy
[2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structure_of_observed_learni...
This also holds for small things like atoms. They are mostly empty space, too. And for bigger things like galaxies.
Most other aspects seem to be "good" choices. Like limiting the speed of things. The way it is limited (as described by special relativity) is even really elegant. The uncertainty as described by quantum theory and how it is coupled to the observer is downright cool. I often think "Yes, if I made a universe from scratch, this seems like a nice choice to go with".
But that everything is so empty? I would not have made that choice, I think.
You?
I use Copilot every day and I can assure you it makes a lot of mistakes. I think that, at least in the short term, CS teachers will still find assignments where it makes mistakes.