The only message that this position would send is that wars of conquest are acceptable and the EU will sit idly by while war rages around them.
You’re basically describing the start of WWII.
> The only message that this position would send is that wars of conquest are acceptable
If the only thing that makes a war bad in your eyes is the goal of conquest, than that seems rather hypocritical in my eyes. Whether land is taken or not, what really makes a country independent is who governs it. Who cares about land, it's just soil and it's not worth human lives.
At least the citizens of eastern UA had referenda to decide if they wanted to be with Russia. I don't think we granted Iraqis or Afghans the same privilege.
> You’re basically describing the start of WWII.
This is such an absurd statement I won't waste my time debating it.
Just a quick reminder, this ain't the first NATO mission to the area.
An aircraft carrier alone is worth billions. Learn how to count, weirdo.
> Just a quick reminder, this ain't the first NATO mission to the area.
Yeah I know, we brought terrific destruction, killed millions of innocents and maimed more in the surroundings.