Readit News logoReadit News
osconfused commented on Using Google without a Google+ profile   googleblog.blogspot.com/2... · Posted by u/davidcgl
greggman · 10 years ago
You might be right but Facebook succeeded dispite the exact same real name policy. It's hard to look at Facebook's success with that policy and then claim it was obvious google would fail with it. The better question is why did Facebook get away with it?
osconfused · 10 years ago
IMO. The problem for Google with real names was people who didn't want to be associated with their real names and already were deeply dependent on Google for the their phone / email. I recall the transgender outing articles [1]. Regardless of whether is was user error or not, it highlights that Google had a different hill to climb than Facebook regarding real name policies.

[1] http://www.zdnet.com/article/google-outed-me/

osconfused commented on Hackers Remotely Attack a Jeep on the Highway   wired.com/2015/07/hackers... · Posted by u/SpaceInvader
tombrossman · 10 years ago
Too late to edit my original comment again so I'll post a reply here as a general reply to those who reacted negatively to my decision to phone the police.

While I strongly support free speech and believe security researchers should be given some extra latitude when appropriate, what I saw was not at all appropriate. I saw two well respected security researchers sitting in a room like Beavis and Butthead laughing and remotely disabling a vehicle on a multi-lane interstate highway, like it was a big joke. The reporter in the Jeep literally says "This is dangerous" and asks urgently for help. This all filmed and posted to Wired for the world to see, like they are proud of it.

Before working with computers I drove tractor-trailers for a while and was lucky to achieve a million-mile safe driving award. I have a pretty good idea of the dangers here and I know that stretch of road well, I've crossed it many times. I know from experience that a car stopped in the middle of a multi-lane interstate is one of the most dangerous situations you can be in. I've had people hit me who didn't see my huge trailer with flashers on and warning triangles out on a sunny day - it happens quite often. I've seen dozens of people killed in situations exactly like this. You see it coming and a random driver just plows into the stopped vehicle.

I exercised my judgement and decided to phone the local Highway Patrol office. I've read the negative comments and I disagree, I still think it was the correct thing to do. If you are a researcher and you do something this dangerous, and are foolish enough to then post it on a high-traffic site like Wired, I think you forfeit any right to a discreet warning and you deserve to have the police show up demanding answers to some tough questions.

osconfused · 10 years ago
I appreciate your call to the cops and your reasoning. I also have driven a significant number of miles for work and have seen a number of people killed in traffic accidents. This "test" was extremely irresponsible. I know I will be downvoted for saying this, but I think you made the correct decision.
osconfused commented on The Call to Kill Adobe’s Flash in Favor of HTML5 Is Rising   arc.applause.com/2015/07/... · Posted by u/werencole
velcro · 10 years ago
A colleague of mine was a very vocal anti-Flash proponent - he used to say that he's tired of his laptop overheating from those 5 stupid animated Flash banners (on his favourite news site).

The irony of it is - I'm not sure 5 animated WebGL banners would keep his laptop any cooler...

osconfused · 10 years ago
Here is a pretty neat WebGL site where you can test that theory. http://david.li/flow/
osconfused commented on The boring front-end developer   thebfed.com/... · Posted by u/edwinjm
alanh · 10 years ago
First things first: This article presents a lovely sentiment — although any argument against CSS preprocessors is a losing one — and is a timely reminder to focus on the things that matter.

However…

When was this published? There’s no date anywhere on the page or even in its source code, but he mentions supporting "IE6 and below". This is actually no longer possible if “HTTPS” is a requirement, as the best version of SSL supported by IE6 is SSL v.3 which suffers from a fatal vulnerability and supporting it on your servers puts your users at risk.

There’s also no need to support IE6. Now that XP is this-time-we-mean-it officially dead and unsupported, you can't even run a fully patched OS with IE6 on it.

Edit: Via another page on the author's site, I was able to find a publication date of 1 October 2014 for this article. (This just barely gets Mr. Silver off the hook, as the final-nail-in-IE6's-coffin SSLv3 bug POODLE was announced a mere 2 weeks later. That is, if we ignore the "and below" remark. No one has tested their site in IE5.5 in damn near a decade now.) Please, authors: Include the full date with your written works. (Leaving off the year is a shamefully common anti-pattern, as it's the most important part!)

osconfused · 10 years ago
This makes me wonder if there is a SEO bump/penalty associated with article dates.
osconfused commented on The Aol Chat Room Monitor Revolt (2014)   priceonomics.com/the-aol-... · Posted by u/wcummings
excitom · 10 years ago
Kind of off topic, but the "Aol" branding has always grated on me. It's an acronym, AOL, not a word.
osconfused · 10 years ago
Originally, yes it was an acronym, then they officially changed it to a word in 2006. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOL
osconfused commented on How for-profit prisons have become the biggest lobby no one is talking about   washingtonpost.com/postev... · Posted by u/bontoJR
Sideloader · 10 years ago
Private prisons are profit making enterprises. Keeping that in mind, how convenient that America's penal system is for many offenders a revolving door that keeps them locked away for decades if not life. Oh! And the prison industry has an influential lobby advocating on its behalf. Do you not see the problem here? Who owns and operates prisons is a very real issue indeed.

I really wonder about this country and its dysfunctional and, frankly, dehumanizing institutions. We deny a significant minority of our citizens the most basic benefits of living in the world's most advanced society. And I'm not talking about the small minority of dangerous offenders that are justifiably kept in prison for life. We also have a difficult time admitting that the profit motive almost certainly guarantees a corrupt and unjust prison system.

osconfused · 10 years ago
We, as a nation, elected "tough on crime" politicians. As you already pointed out, the private prisons lobby. They lobby the politicians we as a nation elected. We have a democracy, we vote for tough on crime politicians. As a result, we imprison lots of people.
osconfused commented on Graphene Brings Photodetectors to the Brink of Terahertz Speeds   spectrum.ieee.org/nanocla... · Posted by u/jonbaer
osconfused · 10 years ago
Pretty awesome article. Wish I understood more about what impact this discovery will have on computing. Will this mean faster cameras and higher FPS when shooting video?
osconfused commented on Who Owns the Copyright to “Happy Birthday”?   priceonomics.com/who-owns... · Posted by u/ryan_j_naughton
osconfused · 10 years ago
Great summary. I had heard this song was copyrighted, but didn't realize the history behind it. It will be interesting to see the outcome of the lawsuits challenging the copyright.
osconfused commented on     · Posted by 
osconfused · 10 years ago
contenteditable is fun. You might also like designMode https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Document/de...
osconfused commented on Mark Zuckerberg AMA on Facebook   facebook.com/zuck/posts/1... · Posted by u/TheDom
osconfused · 10 years ago
Why not on reddit?

u/osconfused

KarmaCake day204April 17, 2014View Original