Readit News logoReadit News
odomus commented on Defeating a 40-year-old copy protection dongle   dmitrybrant.com/2026/02/0... · Posted by u/zdw
odomus · 8 days ago
Is defeating a 40-year-old copy protection mechanism still illegal under Section 1201 of the DMCA, or have they changed the law to make an exception for "very old" software?
odomus commented on HPV vaccination: How the world can eliminate cervical cancer   ourworldindata.org/hpv-va... · Posted by u/ZeroGravitas
prepend · a year ago
I think it’s funny how in the US the vaccine schedule says not to get the HPV vaccine if you’re over 45. That means that insurance won’t cover it and I even struggle finding a doctor who will administer it because it goes against the guidelines.

The rationale is that if you’re 45, you probably already have HPV. But that assumes that you’ve been sexually active all that time. It doesn’t take into account people who were monogamous until their 50s and then started having sex with new partners.

odomus · a year ago
Agreed. And by the logic whereby everybody over a certain age is more likely to already have HPV if they were "active", vaccination should be even more recommended to people >45 who start dating again after a monogamous life, right? Because the assumption would be that they don't have it yet, and they are now starting to have sexual encounters with people who are more likely to have it.

More couples are divorcing after age 50 than ever before, so this is not just abstract theory.

Also last time I checked the statistics for HPV strains like HPV-6 or HPV-16, only 5% or less of males were infected by that specific strain. So on a single-strain basis it's not quite "you probably already have it". Cumulatively, it is no doubt higher considering all strains, but the argument against vaccination for all strains on the basis that recipients may already have a few of those strains seems flawed.

odomus commented on Software Library: Amiga   archive.org/details/softw... · Posted by u/ohjeez
textfiles · 10 years ago
Greetings, Hackernews. Jason Scott, guy adding these to the collection right now. Great work by the team (they'll all get credited in the Internet Archive announcement when it goes up).

All together now:

* Still adding items (we're at 10,380) * AWS instances are screenshotting these to find issues * A notable amount of issues * Yes, we're using AROS kickstarter ROMs. * The emulator (Scripted Amiga Emulator) is excellent and will be improved over time * Enjoy what works * Have fun * Viva Amiga

odomus · 10 years ago
I too would like to see the question asked by unicornporn answered: how could this be legal?

Why isn't the FBI raiding them like it did with Megaupload?

Even if it's technically a non-profit, it's still profiting from this piracy in terms of advertising, which in turn is meant to attract funding, which pays for the officers and other employees and their extravagant office buildings, right? There seems to be a lot of money involved!

The Internet Archive benefits from an exemption concerning the circumvention of copy-protection mechanisms, i.e. section 1201(a)(1). But how can it be covered by the immunity granted under the Safe Harbor provision of section 512(g) of the DMCA, when this is not content submitted by an unrelated user, nor isn't the Internet Archive unaware of the fact that it doesn't own the copyrights on these materials?

The Internet Archive seems to be out of control in the hands of narcissistic egomaniacs like Jason Scott, who doesn't miss an opportunity to boast about his antisocial behavior. Just look at his Twitter feed of the past few days: snaps a photo while driving by a bloody car accident, returns from a wedding overseas and takes a photo of the no-photography sign at the customs office...

This is piracy plain and simple, on both the copyright and the trademark front, on a massive scale. Shame on the Internet Archive for doing what any script kiddie could do from their bedroom (i.e. put an existing TOSEC dump online). With their resources, they should have found a legal way of doing it! We need changes to the law to protect and make accessible true abandonware, not irresponsible actions like these, which are hurting future chances of the Internet Archive and others to foster such changes, and benefit from them.

Shame on you!

u/odomus

KarmaCake day10August 12, 2015View Original