I believe the OP was attempting humour.
Yes. Pitfall of not reading the entire comment before responding.
The article mentions that tether may not have been audited by a third party. So I’m not sure how believable these numbers are.
Except for the court ruling of 13 million in favor of Underwood Ranch, the article isn’t very clear in the amount by which the 2 companies disagreed so difficult to say if it was purely a clash of the 2 owner’s personalities or some other fundamental change in market that brought this sudden schism.