They are, at minimum, information about a particular persons values and perspective. Collectively, those individual opinions are what shape elections and foment uprisings.
> They are, at minimum, information about a particular persons values and perspective. Collectively, those individual opinions are what shape elections and foment uprisings.
Ah. The good old communist dream: The masses are where the truth is. Just one more marginal voice and we will know of the glorious uprising that was foretold.
But of course one would say this, after all, this is the age of the influencer and the knee jerk reaction to any information is to turn to the nearest one and say "thoughts?"
Anyway, it doesn't matter. If you believe opinions are information, more power to you.
Is that a pun about cannabis?
I just don't think Sam Altman is gonna be the guy to command a droid army, and I also don't think they'll look humanoid, and I also think us saying he is a dipshit in public helps undermine his efforts to waste vital resources pursuing that dystopia that he may or may not want and almost certainly won't meaningfully achieve.
Maybe we're just operating on different assumptions. And maybe we have different goals. Perhaps I'm just replying to weigh down the conversation and thread, dilute Altman's profiteering propaganda.
At least you're self aware enough to know that you've contributed noise but not any signal.
And by the way, when you talk to a stranger and immediately get horny to tell them "you sound unhinged" that only reveals that it is you who is in fact unhinged, for you don't know jack about the stranger, but you assume that you are smarter and more knowledgeable than you actually are.
You're the kind of person who says "I don't know what you're talking about" to your interlocutor, and imagine that you saying that statement somehow invalidates the existence of what they are talking about. It's a child's psychology: if you say something doesn't exist then it must not exist.
> It seems like you are confusing threads (again).
smh. There's only 1 thread but perhaps you're the one lost in the maze. There's a word for reprobates like you who, during a discussion, imagine they spot an error, then latch onto that assumed error in order to claim it characterises the entire conversation. Essentially it only shows bad faith and it's a retarded way for you to talk to people. I surely hope your parents will teach you how to talk to strangers. Show them this thread and your responses and ask them for their perspective. If they actually don't know how to teach you, then that's definitely too bad.