The thing that is, however, making Bluesky a genuinely pleasant place to hang out, even despite its size (it's getting relatively large for pleasantness!) is that the invite code system requires that, even with that large number of invite codes, somebody wants to see your posts. It is a pretty strong high-pass filter; they're just scarce enough to value giving them to folks who are going to make for interesting reading.
We can see the impact of outsourcing thinking in modernity, via the simplicity of likes and retweets.
While ChatGPT can be a helpful tool, the issue is that many will substitute rather than augment. It is a giant language averaging machine, which will bring many people up, but bring the other half down, though not quite because the upper echelons will know better than to parrot the parrot.
Summarizing a text will remove the nuance of meaning captured by the authors' words.
Generating words will make your writing blasé.
Do you think ChatGPT can converse like this?
Consequently, the notion that ChatGPT could 'bring down' the more skilled among us may warrant further scrutiny. Isn't it possible that the 'upper echelons' might find novel ways to employ this tool, enhancing rather than undermining their capabilities?
Similarly, while summarization can be a blunt instrument, stripping away nuance, it can also be a scalpel, cutting through verbosity to deliver clear, concise communication. What if ChatGPT could serve as a tutor, teaching us the art of brevity?
The generated words may risk becoming 'blasé', as you eloquently put it, but again, isn't it contingent on how it's used? Can we not find ways to ensure our individual voice still shines through?
So, while I understand and respect your concerns, I posit that our apprehensions should not eclipse the potential that tools like ChatGPT offer us. It might not just be a 'parrot' – but a catalyst for the evolution of human communication.
Though I'm hoping you didn't suspect it, I should warn you this comment was written by you know what (who?).
I'd mostly been going off of The Ultimate Game Boy Talk[0] and the pandocs[1]. In trying to quickly dig up some resources now, I found what at first glance looks like a good blog series[2], so I might take some time to squint at them soon.
If any HNer has other good resources describing it, I'd be thrilled. It's been a couple years since I've hacked on my own emulator, and I got through implementing quite a bit of the behavior. As I recall, I was able to get serial output from the test roms, which was pretty cool. I put it down after getting frustrated trying to render the screen.
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyzD8pNlpwI&t=2957s
[1] http://bgb.bircd.org/pandocs.htm#videodisplay
[2] https://blog.tigris.fr/2019/09/15/writing-an-emulator-the-fi...
https://github.com/nicolas-siplis/feboy
Anyone can create their own market with an arbitrary number of options. The submission links to Argentina's presidential elections market, feel free to try it in the Goerli testnet and let me know in the comments if you need some testnet USDC to play with it.
The "Explore markets" option is super barebones but should at least give you the list of all created markets.
I plan on doing a release on the Polygon network, but I'd love to have some feedback for the beta version.
The whole code is open source but honestly pretty illegible at the moment. I need to dedicate a day to splitting/reorganizing the code, and probably start to consider an actual framework instead of vanilla JS. If all that hasn't scared you away: https://github.com/chiplis/gambeth
I'm looking for people willing to contribute to a UI revamp but PR's are welcome on anything and everything, all of the time.