Readit News logoReadit News
nerdix commented on 30 Year Anniversary of WarCraft II: Tides of Darkness   jorsys.org/archive/decemb... · Posted by u/sjoblomj
rickcarlino · 8 days ago
I don’t think I was using Kali. Did AOL partner with them? As I remember, I found it via AOL in a sponsored or semi official capacity. There were a number of RTS games available via the AOL gaming channel, integrated or closely aligned with the AOL app.
nerdix · 8 days ago
It was a partnership through a multiplayer service called Engage.
nerdix commented on 30 Year Anniversary of WarCraft II: Tides of Darkness   jorsys.org/archive/decemb... · Posted by u/sjoblomj
rickcarlino · 8 days ago
Was this the one AOL charged me to play by the minute when I was a kid?
nerdix · 8 days ago
Yes it was!

I just posted a comment about how amazing the warcraft 2 community was on AOL. Couldn't remember if they charged per minute or per hour so you just confirmed it for me. I just remember that some kids were racking up insane bills. I had to play on Zone (and then Battle.net when Battle.net edition came out) but I loved the AOL war2 message boards.

nerdix commented on 30 Year Anniversary of WarCraft II: Tides of Darkness   jorsys.org/archive/decemb... · Posted by u/sjoblomj
nerdix · 8 days ago
AOL had an amazing warcraft 2 community. There was an online games service in the 90s called Engage and AOL had a partnership with them that allowed AOL users to play multiplayer games through the AOL service. There was a additional charge and it was quite expensive (I believe there was a per minute but my memory is a little fuzzy on the details).

There was a very active AOL message board dedicated to Warcraft 2. Most of the active community used other services (Kali, MSN Zone, and later Battlenet when BNE came out) to play the game since AOL's service was prohibitively expensive.

The best part of the community were the clans. Some of them ended up outliving AOL. The biggest one that I remember was a clan named Splintered Orcs Clan (SoC). Actually just found an old forum post written by the founder of SoC. Looks like they tried to branch out into WoW (I was way out of the scene by then)

https://forums.mmorpg.com/discussion/12955/splintered-orcs-c...

nerdix commented on Show HN: Gemini Pro 3 imagines the HN front page 10 years from now   dosaygo-studio.github.io/... · Posted by u/keepamovin
serendipityAI · 8 days ago
IBM to acquire OpenAI? Gemini doesn't like openAIs prospect
nerdix · 8 days ago
It even tells us why this happened.

> AI progress is stalling. Human equivalence was a mirage

nerdix commented on Galaxy XR: The first Android XR headset   blog.google/products/andr... · Posted by u/thelastgallon
giancarlostoro · 2 months ago
So, it's been a few years, but does Samsung still have... issues with devices exploding? I would not want to live out Sword Art Online IRL.
nerdix · 2 months ago
For anyone actually concerned about this: the Galaxy XR uses an external battery pack with a long power cable just like the Vision Pro. The battery is not attached to the headset itself.
nerdix commented on I almost got hacked by a 'job interview'   blog.daviddodda.com/how-i... · Posted by u/DavidDodda
rdiddly · 2 months ago
I get "job" notification emails from LinkedIn saying "[company] is hiring 45,000 [type of engineer I am]" and I'm always like "Sure they are" and delete it. It's sad really.
nerdix · 2 months ago
Sounds like a common 419 scammer tactic of making absurd claims in order to filter out people that might catch on to the scam.
nerdix commented on Ladybird passes the Apple 90% threshold on web-platform-tests   twitter.com/awesomekling/... · Posted by u/sergiotapia
asadotzler · 2 months ago
It's not against the rules, but it is hostile to the web. Forking the web because a company is big enough to do so may sound just dandy to you, but to the rest of us who have spent decades working on interoperability it's a big middle finger.
nerdix · 2 months ago
Allowing Apple to have a veto on which features are allowed to be added to a browser is even more hostile to the web.
nerdix commented on Ladybird passes the Apple 90% threshold on web-platform-tests   twitter.com/awesomekling/... · Posted by u/sergiotapia
jppittma · 2 months ago
OTOH, are all of the browsers supposed to move in lock step? Is chrome supposed to wait for everyone else's approval before launching any kind of feature?
nerdix · 2 months ago
And one of the browsers is maintained by an OS vendor that benefits from the lock-in that comes from native apps and rent seeking from their app store. I'm sure they would love to control the pace of browser innovation by just deciding not to implement certain features.
nerdix commented on AMD signs AI chip-supply deal with OpenAI, gives it option to take a 10% stake   reuters.com/business/amd-... · Posted by u/chillax
simianwords · 2 months ago
why do you think LLM's will get good enough that they can run locally but the ones requiring nvidia GPU's will not get better?
nerdix · 2 months ago
The models running on $50k GPUs will get better but the models running on commodity hardware will hit an inflection point where they are good enough for most use cases.

If I had to guess I would say that's probably 10 or 15 years away for desktop class hardware and longer for mobile (maybe another 10 years).

Maybe the frontier models of 2040 are being used for more advanced things like medical research and not generating CRUD apps or photos of kittens. That would mean that the average person is likely using the commodity models that are either free or extremely cheap to use.

nerdix commented on AMD signs AI chip-supply deal with OpenAI, gives it option to take a 10% stake   reuters.com/business/amd-... · Posted by u/chillax
dist-epoch · 2 months ago
> I could be thinking about this the wrong way but it appears that AMD is basically subsidizing the cost of the GPUs with equity.

Yes, you are reading it wrong. The big winner here is AMD, not OpenAI.

If there is any signal here, it's that AMD is still in the AI game. AMD stock is up 30% on this news.

nerdix · 2 months ago
I didn't mean to imply that there was a winner or loser. Just that AMD was subsidizing it's GPUs with equity.

I think there are logical reasons for both companies to agree to this deal. AMD is trying to break CUDA dominance. OpenAI is getting extremely cheap compute for expansion and they'd also benefit from the Nvidia monopoly falling if that ever happens.

u/nerdix

KarmaCake day977May 30, 2022View Original