But still not quite for the faint of heart.
Even if the media subsystem is running on dedicated hardware, the fact that it's networked with the rest of the car means that there's still a risk of it being used to gain access to other components.
But still not quite for the faint of heart.
Even if the media subsystem is running on dedicated hardware, the fact that it's networked with the rest of the car means that there's still a risk of it being used to gain access to other components.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/1...
Is this what mass hysteria looks like?
Split the thing you are learning into chunks... making each chunk as small/simple/easy as you can.
Learn the chunks in reverse order. Starting with chunk N, then N-1, all the way to chunk 1. This way, you always start with the hardest part and then move onto the easier (more practiced) parts.
This keeps the focus on the part you are trying to learn, and reduces learning stress.
>That being said, I limit my facebook usage to messanger and wishing people happy birthday, so I guess it could be worse.
You don't need a platform, you need a messaging tool and, if you don't mind the lack of encryption, you could just use email.
As for email, to me it just doesn't serve the same purpose that IM does. It's analogous to sending letters back and forth as opposed to having a face-to-face conversation -- the increased time lag between replies encouraged by the medium has a huge influence on the nature of conversations that occur through it.
I still use email, for example when I want to send something more in-depth to someone and I don't expect a quick reply. But it's not the right tool if I want a real-time, informal conversation with someone, which is most of my conversations.
If such a platform did exist, and I knew about it, I would switch immediately. Their entire business model revolves around getting users addicted, and their history of abusing user's data means I will never be able to even trust the platform.
That being said, I limit my facebook usage to messanger and wishing people happy birthday, so I guess it could be worse.
That being said, I've recently started picking up an interest in lisp (currently slowly making my way through sicp), and I've seen indications that Emacs is somehow more suited to lisp development than vim. As a result, I've actually been considering switching back again, despite emacs pinky, although I'm still on the fence about this.
If anybody here has some knowledge about what Emacs offers in terms of lisp development that vim doesn't (or vice versa) and/or has some good references, I would be very interested to know.
As for the indiscriminate killing of civilians, what else would you call the example from the article?
> in Pakistan, in attempts to take out 41 men, American drones actually killed an estimated 1,147 people (while not all of the 41 targeted figures even died).