I am currently in high school and have taken 17 AP classes. I have tried taking notes time and time again and have consistently found that they do not help me at all. I have a 3.99 GPA, 1570/1600 SAT, and have received 5s on all of my AP Exams. I know how to study and know what works best for me. I am not a notes person, and when teachers force their "scientific" teaching methods upon me, it does nothing but harm my learning and waste time.
I love the idea of science being incorporated into learning but we need to make sure students are allowed to discover what works best for them.
<shameless plug>For other adults interested in learning math, check out my (nonfree) book here: https://noBSmath.com/ PDF preview and sample chapter: https://minireference.com/static/excerpts/noBSmath_v5_previe... I also have a longer book that includes calculus and physics (cf. links in profile). </shameless plug>
Isn’t it all about expectations in the end? The company expects you to meet some set of goals. Conversely, you expect the company to give you benefits and payment.
> Being independent from Python bootstrapping
Yep, conda.
> Being capable of installing and running Python in one unified congruent way across all situations and platforms.
Yep, conda.
> Having a very strong dependency resolver.
Yep, conda (or mamba).
The main thing conda doesn't seem to have which uv has is all the "project management" stuff. Which is fine, it's clear people want that. But it's weird to me to see these articles that are so excited about being able to install Python easily when that's been doable with conda for ages. (And conda has additional features not present in uv or other tools.)
The pro and con of tools like uv is that they layer over the base-level tools like pip. The pro of that is that they interoperate well with pip. The con is that they inherit the limitations of that packaging model (notably the inability to distribute non-Python dependencies separately).
That's not to say uv is bad. It seems like a cool tool and I'm intrigued to see where it goes.
The keyboard animation happens on the touchdown event, whereas the letter is entered into the text box on the touchup event.
Between the two, more information might emerge about the touch - for example the exact shape of the touched area, and movement during the touch, etc.
I would guess the keyboard sees a down in one spot, and an up in a slightly different spot which falls into another letter.