Readit News logoReadit News
mudita commented on Solving the first 100 Project Euler problems using 100 languages   github.com/jaredkrinke/10... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
thaumasiotes · 8 months ago
Do you ever need to start coding? I thought it was a requirement of the project that problems be solvable with pencil and paper.
mudita · 8 months ago
While some problems are actually solvable with just pencil and paper, this is not a requirement and the intention of the project is that problems will be solved with a combination of insight and coding.

From the Project Euler website:

"Project Euler is a series of challenging mathematical/computer programming problems that will require more than just mathematical insights to solve. Although mathematics will help you arrive at elegant and efficient methods, the use of a computer and programming skills will be required to solve most problems."

Deleted Comment

mudita commented on Deriving the Kelly Criterion to Maximise Profits   obrhubr.org/kelly-criteri... · Posted by u/obrhubr
nighthawk454 · a year ago
A few links through, this Ship Investor simulator is a great super-simple game to test some intuition: https://xkqr.org/ship-investor/ship-investor.html
mudita · a year ago
The game is a bit weird. It often offers very bad deals, without an option not to invest. For example for the Gibraltar strait, the game gives the information that the probablity of success is between 90% and 100% and that it’s been traversed 31 times with a 90 % success rate. Then it offers me the choice between an investment of different sizes, where I cannot win back more than my investment, so I have to risk money for no possible gain (invest 167 ducats in shipment worth 167 ducats).
mudita commented on Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics   matthewball.co/all/fanspr... · Posted by u/mef
jayd16 · a year ago
So like, movies are more para social because they have less interaction?
mudita · a year ago
I wouldn’t say that movies per se are parasocial, but if you behave and feel like you have a relationship with somebody in a movie, then it’s probably parasocial.

To a degree it’s also quite normal to have parasocial reactions to personaes from media, it only becomes problematic once people substitute actual social relationships with extreme parasocial relationships.

mudita commented on Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics   matthewball.co/all/fanspr... · Posted by u/mef
ehnto · a year ago
Parasocial relationships don't require interaction, you could just watch a twitch streamer a lot. I think if we defined it by requiring interaction we would underestimate the percieved impact of these social phenomenon.
mudita · a year ago
It not only doesn’t require interaction, the lack of interaction is what makes is parasocial.
mudita commented on The Spellbinding Life of Koji Kashin: Japan's Legendary Wandering Magician   tokyoweekender.com/art_an... · Posted by u/PaulHoule
PaulHoule · a year ago
mudita · a year ago
I didn’t know the term sinosphere until now, thanks for making me aware of it.
mudita commented on I spend £8,500 a year to live on a train   metro.co.uk/2024/03/03/sp... · Posted by u/surprisetalk
sandworm101 · 2 years ago
I do not believe.

Does this guy have a passport? Then he has a mailing address.

He claims to work. Then he pays taxes. In which country? he has a mailing address.

At 17, I'd bet good money that his mailing address is also his parent's mailing address. This is a gap student having fun bouncing around Europe, about as nomadic as any other backpacker.

mudita · 2 years ago
As far as I know, it is possible to have the entry "ohne festen Wohnsitz"(without a permanent residence) instead of a mailing address in a German passport and he's legally not allowed to use his parents address, if he's not there for at least 183 days a year.

But I don't really understand how this small legal detail would change the whole character of his life experience, in any case. No matter what is written in his passport, he spends the whole year in a train.

mudita commented on Why isn't chess popular in Japan?   lichess.org/@/datajunkie/... · Posted by u/cushpush
tromp · 2 years ago
I think the numbers are taken from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_complexity

We discuss the numbers for Go in the introduction of our paper https://matthieuw.github.io/go-games-number/AGoogolplexOfGoG...

mudita · 2 years ago
I just wanted to say, I stumbled upon your website a few years ago through the Tromp-Taylor rules of Go and found the things you do impressive and inspiring. It’s a nice surprise to see you commenting here.
mudita commented on Germany is debating whether to ban AfD as the party surges to 21% in the polls   telegraph.co.uk/news/2023... · Posted by u/mutant_glofish
porkbeer · 2 years ago
How is banning political parties as they become popular 'protecting democracy'? I don't agree with most of their politics, but am more afraid of draconian control of the political process 'for our own good', than some biased actors who should already be constrained by the rule of law.
mudita · 2 years ago
I’m not talking about the AfD here, but trying to quickly answer the question how banning political parties can seen as justified in principle:

Banning a political party is an important instrument in a wider philosophy known in Germany as “wehrhafte Demokratie” (defensive democracy). This philosophy states that democratic states should have legal tools with which they can defend themselves against people, who want to attack the democratic order itself.

Wehrhafte Demokratie is a very well established and accepted concept, here, partially because of a wish to avoid repeating the mistakes of the Weimarer Republik. It’s also justified by the belief that democracy is not just a dictatorship of the majority, but that even a majority of voters is limited in what they can do and that democracy also includes for example the protection of minorities.

> biased actors who should already be constrained by the rule of law

Banning a political party works by the rules of law.

The legal barriers for banning a political party are quite high in Germany. Basically for a ban it must be proven that the party as a whole, not just single member, have the goal to attack key elements of the democratic order itself and that there is a real danger that they could succeed.

The last condition can also be a legal reason to only ban a party once it actually gets popular: As long as it is unpopular, judges don’t see the condition fulfilled, that the party presents a real danger, so they won’t ban the party. This happened with Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands (NPD), which was ruled to be verfassungsfeindlich (an enemy of the constitution), but not banned because it was so ineffective und unpopular.

u/mudita

KarmaCake day847March 1, 2016View Original