Readit News logoReadit News
mucle6 commented on Accountability Sinks   250bpm.substack.com/p/acc... · Posted by u/msustrik
crazygringo · 4 months ago
> So I thought that the problem could be solved by just arriving there by any other flight, which I booked almost immediately.

Why did you do that? Especially when that cost you extra money?

You should have talked to the airline directly, explained you'd missed your flight because they gave you the wrong airport, and the airline would have rebooked you and everything would have been fine. People miss flights all the time and this is an entirely normal process.

It's been standard practice for a long time if you miss a first leg, that you forfeit the rest. They're going to reuse those seats for e.g. other people who missed their original flights. It's a type of flexibility built into the whole system.

Connecting flights are super useful because you can work with the airline to reschedule the whole thing, and the airline is responsible if you can't make a connection because an earlier leg is delayed.

I truly don't understand why you would have taken it into your own hands to buy a separate replacement ticket on your own, instead of talking to the airline. Even in your second example, why didn't you work with the airline to reschedule your missed flight? Even if they for some reason can't reschedule, they will often keep your return flight valid if you have an obviously good reason (e.g. a visa issue during COVID). But you do have to contact them immediately.

I'm sorry you didn't know how all this worked, but when in doubt, contact customer service ASAP to see if they can help. Don't just go buy separate tickets on your own, and then assume later legs will still be valid. That's not how it works.

mucle6 · 4 months ago
This reminds me of the quote "I know just enough to be dangerous"

I wonder how long until we have an AI on our shoulder saying "Hey why are you booking a new flight, there is a better option"

mucle6 commented on Users say T-Mobile must pay for killing "lifetime" price lock   arstechnica.com/tech-poli... · Posted by u/rntn
hunter2_ · 10 months ago
I'll accept that there could be precedent to use non-layman definitions of certain words, but how do you apply that justification to this quote from TFA:

> "T-Mobile will never change the price you pay for your T-Mobile One plan," the company said in a pledge that enticed many people to switch plans or even switch from another carrier to T-Mobile.

I don't think it's reasonable to use anything but regular definitions for the words in that particular quote.

Rather, they are pulling this off a completely different way:

> "We are not raising the price of any of our plans; we are moving you to a newer plan with more benefits at a different cost."

So the price of the service is not changing during the reasonable lifetime of the service nor the lifetime of the consumer. Rather, the service is no longer being offered.

mucle6 · 10 months ago
That is infuriating corp speak. I'm sympathetic if a business can't fulfill its obligations, nobody wants to fail. If they had admitted they messed up and wanted to fix it then I honestly would be okay with that.

But to try to ditch their responsibility with a technicality is so scummy. I don't have T-Mobile, and with that one line of corp speak I never will

mucle6 commented on Can SpaceX land a rocket with 1/2 cm accuracy?   theshamblog.com/can-space... · Posted by u/scottshambaugh
meindnoch · 10 months ago
The robot knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation.
mucle6 commented on US weighs Google break-up in landmark antitrust case   ft.com/content/f6e84608-e... · Posted by u/JumpCrisscross
internet101010 · a year ago
I have always thought the reason they became alphabet was because of the expectation that they would eventually get broken up and wanted a company for each letter.
mucle6 · a year ago
I think they already had a company for each letter when they became alphabet
mucle6 commented on Meta Movie Gen   ai.meta.com/research/movi... · Posted by u/brianjking
mucle6 · a year ago
The text to modify a video looks so cool
mucle6 commented on Orion, our first true augmented reality glasses   about.fb.com/news/2024/09... · Posted by u/mfiguiere
zmmmmm · a year ago
If they stopped forward investment today, Reality Labs would be profitable just selling Quest hardware and software and Meta Ray Bans. The reason it loses money hand over fist is because they are not nearly done yet with where they want the tech to be.
mucle6 · a year ago
Source?
mucle6 commented on Amazon bans its drivers from moving their own lips too much at work   freightwaves.com/news/sho... · Posted by u/jmsflknr
consteval · a year ago
This argument is absurd. You can tell how absurd it is because if you just take it to it's logical conclusion, suddenly you're supporting indentured servitude in Dubai.

Do you support that? Almost certainly not. So the only resolution is you don't actually believe this argument.

mucle6 · a year ago
Indentured servitude prevents switching jobs, so we can't assume its their best option. As long as workers are free to switch jobs, we can assume its their best option, that despite all of the downsides, they think its worth it.

I'm guessing Amazon pays above average and that's why people keep working for them despite their reputation. The people there have a choice. Keep making more at Amazon but be treated poorly, and that's a choice they make.

If Amazon doesn't like a worker, they can fire them.

If a worker doesn't like Amazon, they can quit.

You can hate Amazon, thats fine, you can choose to never work for Amazon, thats fine, but lets not lie to ourselves. The people who choose to work at Amazon want to work there. They all applied, accepted the job, and show up every day.

Dead Comment

mucle6 commented on Amazon bans its drivers from moving their own lips too much at work   freightwaves.com/news/sho... · Posted by u/jmsflknr
egypturnash · a year ago
Success in a boycott is not necessarily destroying Amazon. Success is making this decision cause enough financial pain to Amazon that they reverse it, and the next time some Frederick Taylor wannabe proposes something terrible along the same lines, everyone else reminds him of how much it hurt when they tried to stop the delivery drivers from singing along to music. Success is this weakening Amazon enough for their low-wage workers to unionize and demand representation on the board of directors and a bigger share of the profits.
mucle6 · a year ago
If the workers want better conditions they can leave. If all options are below what we would consider moral then we should change laws. The solution to a problem in a free market is not inside of one company.
mucle6 commented on Amazon bans its drivers from moving their own lips too much at work   freightwaves.com/news/sho... · Posted by u/jmsflknr
delichon · a year ago
> No matter how badly Amazon treats its workers, we all keep shopping there.

Because they keep working there. So the workers think the conditions are worth it in exchange for their paycheck. If I disagree and shop elsewhere I'm effectively disagreeing with the workers and telling them I think they are making a bad deal and I don't want to contribute to their livelihood. But I don't actually know that they can make a better deal elsewhere.

Before I move my purchase to Newegg or whatever should I first make sure that their working conditions are better? Or just judge by how often I see each company mentioned in the media?

I think that the voluntary nature of employment is a sufficient circuit breaker. If it gets bad enough we can and do leave for better opportunities elsewhere. It wouldn't be the first, second or third time for me, and that includes minimum wage jobs. So I don't feel the duty to investigate the working conditions of each business I deal with.

mucle6 · a year ago
Everyone else in this thread frustrates me, but I understand it. Compassion is ingrained in us, while free market economics is not.

Nobody here is really thinking through what happens if they are successful at boycotting and destroying Amazon. What would they say to these people they're supposedly helping?

"I got you laid off! You don't have to work here anymore! You're free! Maybe you can't feed your family now but at least you can move your lips while you drive!"

u/mucle6

KarmaCake day222March 10, 2017View Original