Readit News logoReadit News
monster_group commented on Questions engineers should ask future employers in interviews   dollardhingra.substack.co... · Posted by u/dollardhingra
monster_group · 2 months ago
Ideally yes, one would ask these questions. Practically, there is not enough time. You'd be lucky to get even 5 minutes to ask all these questions. Even if you have the time, you have to ask these questions in a diplomatic manner. Unless you are a well known hot shot in your field, a job interview is marred by power imbalance and any signal that you are cynical, confrontational, question authority etc. will count against you. So do ask these questions, but be careful how you frame them.
monster_group commented on Americans Are Using PTO to Sleep, Not for Vacation–Report   newsweek.com/americans-ar... · Posted by u/randycupertino
re-thc · 5 months ago
Unlimited PTO = never waking up?
monster_group · 5 months ago
One doesn't need unlimited PTO to be dead.
monster_group commented on Time Dilation Formula / Calculator   timedilationformula.com/... · Posted by u/mpclarkson
monster_group · a year ago
Author's description of twin paradox is incorrect. In fact, the paradox is not described at all. The paradox is that since motion is relative then from both twin's perspective the other twin goes on a journey and ages slowly. So why it is that on returning, only the traveling twin has aged slowly? The answer is that both twins indeed see each other age slowly but for the traveling twin to come back they have to slow down to zero and reverse direction. At that moment the frame is no longer inertial. While turning around, the traveling twin will see the stationary twin age very quickly (enough to catch up with their earth age), so when they meet there's no paradox. For each of them the other has aged as per their observations.
monster_group commented on Ask HN: Where to put a static page that would last forever    · Posted by u/DanielBMarkham
monster_group · a year ago
Nothing lasts forever. Even 100 years is a very long time given the technology / cultural / legal changes. It's futile to try to come up with an eternal solution. Just host it on something that seems to be reliable / stable for the foreseeable future and tell the younger generation to migrate it after you are gone to whatever tech of their day is going to be. If the younger generation does not care to migrate your work, then it is not of value to their generation and it is OK for it to fizzle out. Sorry if that sounds harsh, but it is probably best to have realistic expectations about how much people would care about your work after you are gone.
monster_group commented on Ghost jobs are wreaking havoc on tech workers   sfgate.com/tech/article/g... · Posted by u/Umofomia
ryandrake · a year ago
Embarrassing admission: I don't really understand how "networking" works when it comes to getting a job. It's always just stated: "Go network, bro!" but without any explanation of how it is supposed to work. I wish someone could pretend I was a dummy, and explain the process to me using simple words. From start (you don't know anyone working at company X) to finish (you accept a job at company X).

I remember long ago the career development people at my university would tell us to all go out and "network" company representatives when they come during career week. The way it was explained to me was to go up to them and pretend to be their friend, talk about sportsball, drink alcohol with them, gain some rapport or something... It was never really clear what the right magical incantation was. All I know was some people were really good at it and got invited to interview at dozens of companies, and other had no luck at all.

But, just for argument's sake, let's say I go out and successfully manage to "network" you. You now know me and think I would be a good employee. What now? I guess I say "Hey, rightbyte, I'm looking for a job at your company. Do you know of any roles that are hiring?" You say "Sure, here's job position XYZ, and the link to go apply. Good luck!" And now I'm back where I started. Or if I'm lucky, you will refer me in your company's HR system, giving your digital "thumbs up" in that system, and that referral will send me... an E-mail with the link where I should go apply. I'm still not that much better off. Is that thumbs up going to let me skip rounds of interviews or give me extra points when the yes/no decision happens? How does it help me break through the hundreds of other candidates that are cold-applying?

I've had people reach out to me and ask me to refer them for a job with my employer, and in most companies, all I can do is point them to a job link. I'm lowly worker-bee number 52231, I don't have some kind of hiring boost I can hand out to people.

The whole 'networking' enterprise seems like a bizarre, opaque process where nobody can explain how it works, but everyone's advice is that we should all somehow "go do it" as it's an important component of a job search.

monster_group · a year ago
The main (and possibly only) benefit of networking is that hiring manager will look at your resume. Without networking, your resume may never even been seen by the hiring manager. But beyond that networking does not matter for the candidate. In fact, FAANG companies go out of their way to make sure that the person who referred the candidate is excluded from having any involvement in the interview process. The days where you get to skip rounds just because you know someone are gone.
monster_group commented on Interviewing the Interviewer: Questions to Uncover a Company's True Culture   praachi.work/blog/questio... · Posted by u/abhas9
janalsncm · 2 years ago
A while back I interviewed with Meta. They have an “onsite” which is really just 5 hours of interviews over zoom. I split it up over several days.

After the first day (which I didn’t feel great about) I asked the recruiter if I had passed the interviews I had given, since there was presumably no point in prioritizing further Meta interviews if I already failed. But they refused to give me any useful information.

Maybe that’s just part of their “process” but let me tell you, that process sucks. If I have other interviews to prepare for, I need to know how much time to allocate to each role. Thats not the only thing that turned me off about meta but it stuck out to me as unnecessarily bureaucratic and inflexible.

monster_group · 2 years ago
This process is quite normal. The reason is two fold - first they want multiple people to interview the candidate before making a decision, one bad interview doesn't necessarily rule out a candidate. The second reason is the candidate experience. Some candidates feel humiliated if their interview is cut short and will harbor bad impression of the company for a long time. The company doesn't want that.
monster_group commented on Quitting engineering to pursue art full-time   staysketchy.com/p/pablo-a... · Posted by u/Tomte
passion__desire · 2 years ago
I remember a quantum information theorist went to become a hard labourer in construction because he thought "physical labour is food for the soul"
monster_group · 2 years ago
And I want to become a quantum theorist. I think being able to manipulate symbols on paper and explain the universe is food for the soul. Grass always seems greener on the other side. :-)
monster_group commented on When a black hole and a neutron star merge   mpg.de/21778967/0404-grav... · Posted by u/belter
radicalbyte · 2 years ago
> If you have two spin entangled particles and you change > the spin of one, the spin of the other does not change

It really irks me we don't use a simple analogy for entanglement: put two balls of different colors in two boxes. Randomize the boxes. Take one of the boxes to the other side of the room then open it.

You now know the colour of the ball in the other box.

Only you can't implement faster-than-light communication with that so we instead mislead people..

monster_group · 2 years ago
That's not the correct analogy. In classical case, the color of the ball is fixed even before you open the box (you just don't know it). But in quantum entanglement case, the spin is not fixed until it is measured (because the wave function hasn't collapsed). But as soon as you measure the spin you get either up or down value. If you get up, then the other entangled particle will necessarily have down value when measured, If you get the spin down, the other particle will necessarily have the spin up. Now you may say that, the spin of the first particle was fixed all along and we just didn't know it. This argument is called "hidden variables theory". But it is proven by Bell's inequality that such a theory cannot exist, so the spin of particle 1 is indeed a random outcome. What's "spooky" is that in spite of it being random, it instantaneously fixes the spin of the other particle.
monster_group commented on the US is no country for old men   aljazeera.com/opinions/20... · Posted by u/thread_id
monster_group · 2 years ago
While the article may have some truth to it, the emotionally charged language makes it difficult to see the article as having been written objectively.
monster_group commented on I worked in Amazon HR and was disgusted at what I was seeing with PIP plans   businessinsider.com/amazo... · Posted by u/cebert
fourseventy · 2 years ago
Wtf is Pivot
monster_group · 2 years ago
It's the element in quick sort that you swap around to make sure all elements before pivot are less than it and all elements after are greater than it.

u/monster_group

KarmaCake day1155December 28, 2013View Original