This research shows physicians harmed kids recommending they avoid allergens like peanuts, is that something we should ignore because all the benefits of science are “worth it”?
Science is amazing not because it’s always right, but because it (should) strive to always do better next time
doing nothing is better than something if that something might hurt people without understanding how and why
And that's what it's become.
Hilariously incorrect.
> Cause you can just go to a bar and get it for free.
Not at the same convenience, can you ;) So they are selling convenience. Chess.com isn't selling convenience - both platforms are websites you access identically. They're not offering portability or solving a distribution problem. They're artificially limiting a digital service that costs them essentially nothing to provide unlimited access to.
I don't feel responsible for grounding the facts you somehow believe in.
But in another mood, I might have shared links to certain Telegram groups, or connect you with some people I know personally. They would be eager to enlighten you, if you are in for that.
Do you think the earth is flat? Who the fuck cares about Telegram groups in this context?
Dead Comment
The left instead rationalized it under "free speech is not freedom from consequences", called them Nazis, fascists, bigots, homophobes, misogynists, you'd need a thesaurus. Every slur in the thesaurus, they used. When your opponent plays dirty, actively seeks to get you fired from your job, and your figureheads get killed (Kirk) or nearly killed (Trump), why uphold the rules?
EDIT: > Admit that your position is an unprincipled one and based on feelings rather than thought.
Admit that the right has realized that neither side gives a damn about principles; but the left has no right to claim to be principled after 2020.
Ah ok, so only your right to free speech is important and no one is allowed to react negatively to it and have their own free speech. Thanks for making that clear.
Dead Comment