i'm interested in this idea. can you expand on that? what functionality are you replacing? i don't currently use a DE and i get along pretty well doing most of my work in alacritty and firefox-esr. occasionally i drop into pcmanfm if i need a visual file browser, and i use feh to preview images.
For many years now KDE has focused on polish, bug fixing and "nice-to-have" improvements rather than major redesigns, and it paid off.
That number seems suspicious. Right now my i5-6500T server is idling at <5W and an N100 is supposed to be even more efficient.
This is an interesting problem you've faced, their marketing claim is that they have the most comprehensive catalog of packages (and I'm inclined to believe it). I very rarely run into broken packages, and that's usually resolved by using a stable release for that specific package - and it's not like my usage of packages is lightweight (7292 lines of nix config). That's on NixOS (and Silverblue, and Ubuntu) at least.
Things just work with pacman or dnf.
If you want to maximize all windows on run, niri can do that with a rule. It then becomes like a monocle layout where you can use swipes/keyboard/scroll wheel to navigate between maximized windows. I don't know of any DE that will run all windows maximized by default.
Too bad I no longer have an 800x600 netbook. Niri would be perfect for it.
> Compare that to Gnome+paperwm (1.6GB)
Anything seems lightweight if you compare it to a DE well known for its bloat.
A minimal Niri functional environment is similar to IceWM in RAM usage. I used to run antiX in VMs.