A modern machine shouldn’t take this long, so likely something big is being imported unnecessarily at startup. If the big package itself is the issue, file it on their tracker.
A modern machine shouldn’t take this long, so likely something big is being imported unnecessarily at startup. If the big package itself is the issue, file it on their tracker.
I could see it being too complicated for normal people, but for geeks? It's certainly not to complicated for me and my geek friends -- that's what we've been doing for years.
Maybe suboptimal is a better word.
So Netscape got visibility for their language, Sun got the #1 browser to ship their language and they had leverage over Microsoft to extortionately license it for Internet Explorer. There were debates among the Java team about whether or not this was a "good" thing or not, I mean for Sun sure, but the confusion between what was "Java" was not. The politics won of course, and when they refused to let the standards organization use the name "JavaScript" the term ECMAScript was created.
So there's that. But how we got here isn't particularly germane to the argument that yes, we should all be able to call it the same thing.
---
Edit: The above makes it sound like there was another scripting language:
> they had a small problem which was that this was kind of a competitor to their own scripting language.
Also, didn't said company piss people off in some way that led to Open Tofu being created?
Note that if you're that far behind on a project, the rational choice is to significantly cut its scope, and push the rest to the following releases.