This seems like it could provide a false sense of security to many if used widely by the general population.
>Positive results may be due to past or present infection with non-SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus strains, such as coronavirus HKU1, NL63, OC43, or 229E.
I'm getting ready to start a hobby project that involves scanning the interior surfaces of a house. Ideally the accuracy would be at least 1/16" (1.5mm), including any scan-stitching required because the sensor had to be moved around.
I've seen a few promising products, but none stands out as a perfect match.
Angular accuracy 18” Range accuracy 1.0 mm + 10 ppm 3D point accuracy 1.9 mm @ 10 m 2.9 mm @ 20 m 5.3 mm @ 40 m
(disclaimer: I work for Leica)
In a ToF camera (at least some of them - see lock-in pixels), each pixel is sampled four times per cycle to detect the phase offset from the outgoing illumination. The SwissRanger was one of the first time of flight cameras. The reason it suffers short range is because of phase ambiguity - the lasers are modulated at around 30MHz which gives a wavelength of 10 m or so. The ambiguity distance is half this (5 m). LIDAR systems historically got round this by using multiple modulation frequencies for different distance scales.
This tech is now everywhere thanks to Microsoft buying Canesta.
source: I work at Leica Geosystems.
And produce outputs that look more like these: https://truviewglobal.leica-geosystems.com/welcome
(full disclosure: I work for Leica Geosystems).
Could you provide some links to read? I just can't imagine how it's possible.
(full disclosure: I work for Leica Geosystems.)
With real-time kinematic service, our GPS receivers give you 8mm horizontally and 15mm vertically. And you will get 3mm hz and 4mm vertical with post processing.
So, in other words, ClearMotion is producing a technology that other OEM's have been doing for years. Just off the top of my head, Cadillac has their magnetic suspension (which uses a fluid that changes viscosity in the presence of a magnetic field. I guess this is the same as what TFA claims is brand new.) The Ford Raptor with their live valve by Fox has a solenoid valve that regulates the shim pack. (Funny enough, I've spent all morning doing a FEA analysis of their valve.) The latest Mercedes Gelandewagen also has solenoid valves in their dampers to switch between soft and hard damping. Citroen has been doing it since the 50's with a purely mechanical system.
The basic idea is very simple: you want a computer to regulate the damper between soft and firm, as the road dictates. The implementation of this can become very complicated and there's a number of very different implementations. If I remember right, the Bose implementation required too much electricity to be practical. Most other implementations have some type of solenoid valve to control the pressure drop of the hydraulic fluid across an orifice. Again, the theory is simple, but mass producing a system that is cheap, reliable, yet can respond in milliseconds is difficult.