Readit Newsmhmmmmmm commented on TradeExpert, a trading framework that employs Mixture of Expert LLMs arxiv.org/abs/2411.00782... · Posted by u/wertyk
So they used a LLM with knowledge cut in mid 2023 to evaluate 2023? Seems like a classic leakage problem.
From paper: "testing set: January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023"
From the Llama 2 doc: "(...) some tuning data is more recent, up to July 2023."
Removing the "Market expert" which uses OHLCV (Open, High, Low, Close, Volume) also drops the sharpee from 5.01 to 1.88 while also increasing the max draw down to 13.29% (v.s. 9.70% for the index). I'd be very surprised if the pre training of the base model was the only source of leakage...
mhmmmmmm commented on Claude's system prompt is over 24k tokens with tools github.com/asgeirtj/syste... · Posted by u/mike210
Do they actually test these system prompts in a rigorous way? Or is this the modern version of the rain dance?
I don't think you need to spell it out long-form with fancy words like you're a lawyer. The LLM doesn't work that way.
They certainly do, and also offer the tooling to the public: https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/build-with-claude/prompt-...
They also recommend to use it to iterate on your own prompts when using Claude Code for example
mhmmmmmm commented on Ladder: Self-improving LLMs through recursive problem decomposition arxiv.org/abs/2503.00735... · Posted by u/fofoz
Does the massive context still needs to be dragged around? Until get a neural network that adjusts weights in real time without relying on a huge clump of context being cycled there, I don't think there will be an AGI or even an impressive "agent". Current agents are just LLM looping lmao sold to people with no knowledge how they work at all.
There is https://www.rwkv.com/ which is an LLM based on RNN's, thus having "infinite" context length, it comes with its own tradebacks though. (Notably that its impossible to actually store infinite information in the network, so it prunes based on which information it finds more important.)
There's some info and speculation in these two (distinct) articles, but I'd love to know technical details of where the gaffs were.
eg. Was client software compromised? Did the multisig keyholders succumb to social engineering? Were the signers using airgapped machines / hardware devices?
https://blockworks.co/news/bybit-hack-raises-security-questi...
https://x.com/tayvano_/status/1847877011462901915
This thread has some info about very similar past attacks, should give some insights into the level of sophistication that goes into something like that.
Solutions have existed for years (eg Gnosis Safe), they just aren’t being used by that exchange.
Bybit was quite literally using Gnosis Safe for the compromised wallet.
Let's see it another way: there's absolutely no way that in the 2-3 hours the post was up a person not familiar with the gamblecoin ecosystem could purchase $LIBRA, let alone pour thousands of dollars in. The people who lost money are all professional memecoin gamblers, and the ones who pocketed in are obviously connected to the project leaders. Cyptobros want to have unlimited freedom to trade whatever they want without regulation, which is fine for me, but then they shouldn't whine when/if they are rug-pulled.
For all the outrage, I yet have to see a single person in Argentina produce a TXHASH that proves they put money on the project. This is not something you can just log in on Binance and buy with cash in a single click. Meanwhile, states operate their own lotteries and casinos (e.g. "Lotería de la Provincia") where the poor and hopeful go to pay a tax on their ignorance.
Of course, the president and his advisors are responsible for not investigating enough and blindly trusting these so-called "businessmen". We'll see what the Law has to say about that, but I remind you that Argentina is a place where a vice-president tried to steal a company (look up Ciccone Calcográfica).
Last, the 4.4B number looks huge, but that is just "market cap", i.e. valuation extrapolated to the total supply of tokens, and not the actual amount of money that went into the coin.
> This is not something you can just log in on Binance and buy with cash in a single click.
You would've definitely been able to buy it with cash and a few clicks, for example using moonshot. (And I'm sure a couple other / similar platforms)
The $100/mo max plan lets you use a Claude Code with a fixed bill. There’s some usage limits though.