Mind sharing the name? I'm out there in a few weeks.
AZ: https://www.danzeisendairy.com/ WA: https://www.twinbrookcreamery.com/
To me, this (the unwinding of the large consolidated food companies) is largely a good thing.
At Elation we make tools for physicians and their patients that improve the efficiency and fidelity of their relationship, and help to make the delivery of excellent, proactive healthcare possible. We're nearing the end of a hiring push in engineering, but still have a couple roles to fill (as well as various opening across the rest of the organization). See them all here: https://www.elationhealth.com/careers/
In engineering our biggest hiring focuses at the moment is for software engineers on our backend team, ideally based in the San Diego area (particularly North County Coastal) - though remote is also an option. If that's of interest to you feel free to drop me a line! I'm doing the hiring in SD and after years of remote and SF based recruiting really interested in meeting exciting people down here (I live in Encinitas/Carlsbad area).
Tech stack is AWS/Python/Django/MySQL/ReactJS. We have a great team full of people that really value working closely with product, customer-experience, and users. Lots of interesting problems to solve!
Apply online at the link above -- Also feel free to reach out to me directly if you have any questions or are curious! I'm always happy to chat about the position, the company, or healthcare in general.
Faithlife is looking for an experienced engineers and engineering managers with the knowledge and skills to help build products that serve the church.
Technologies: C#/.NET, JavaScript, React
Where we can hire: https://faithlife.com/careers/remote
Apply online or email devjobs@faithlife.com
Senior Fullstack: https://fl.vu/srfullstack
Senior Backend: https://fl.vu/srbackend
Engineering Managers: https://fl.vu/engmgr
Payments Engineer: https://fl.vu/payeng
Transit is mostly a fixed cost business (step-fixed cost technically). That means that the marginal rider brings marginal revenue, but no additional costs. Transit operations have a break-even point: when you have X riders, you break even. Anything more is pure profit, and anything less is a negative cash flow.
When you rob transit of customers by subsidizing cars, you make transit less sustainable. Subsidizing cars literally means you'll end up subsidizing transit too. The opposite is true, and it's provable: Transit is dramatically more profitable in countries where driving is less subsidized. It was wildly profitable in the US too, before we started subsidizing cars.
The answer to getting more transit funding isn't to pay more in general fund taxes or fares, it is actually to tax road users. Tax road users appropriately, and transit will have more more users, more revenues, and little to no increase in costs. A 5% reduction in car use could double transit ridership nationwide. Oh, and our roads will have more maintenance funding, less congestion, and less wear and tear. A win-win if there ever was one.
The US spends around $35 billion/year in actual subsidies on fossil fuels.[1] (About $20 billion to producers, and about $15 billion to consumers.
Further more, the cost of not charging the fossil fuel industry for carbon emissions should absolutely be counted as a real subsidy, although its value is harder to calculate. But we force industries to clean up other pollutants, or we otherwise regulate their environmental impact, which costs them. If we gave one industry a pass on those regulations, that would be uncontroversially a subsidy.
1. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97...
Elevating the device to to the level of your heart seems like standard practice. Every home blood pressure monitor I've ever used requires this. And it's also the way my doctor does it in his office with both electronic and the squeezie bulb blood pressure thing.