Readit News logoReadit News
matco11 commented on A.I. researchers are negotiating $250M pay packages   nytimes.com/2025/07/31/te... · Posted by u/jrwan
matco11 · 24 days ago
I love basketball, soccer, and tennis… but you guys have no idea how powerful I have found to share stories like this with my young kids.

Yes, I want them to excel in sports, but these articles provide a crucial counterweight to the all-too-common narrative that becoming a pro athlete is the ultimate dream. Instead, these stories show that being exceptional in STEM isn’t just something you do because you are curious, you find it interesting, you enjoy it (all great motivators), or to please parents and teachers (generally, probably, lesser quality motivators): these stories show that being exceptional in STEM can open doors to exciting, high-impact careers.

It’s been amazing to watch my kids begin to reframe STEM not as the “sensible” thing to do, but as something genuinely cool, aspirational, and full of opportunity.

matco11 commented on Reflections on OpenAI   calv.info/openai-reflecti... · Posted by u/calvinfo
torginus · a month ago
Here's what I think - while Altman was busy trying to convince the public the AGI was coming in the next two weeks, with vague tales that were equaly ominous and utopistic, he (and his fellow leaders) have been extremely busy at trying hard to turn OpenAI into a product company with some killer offerings, and from the article, it seems they were rather good and successful in that.

Considering the high stakes, money, and undoubtedly the ego involved, the writer might have acquired a few bruises along the way, or might have lost out on some political in fights (remember how they mentioned they built multiple Codex prototypes, it must've sucked to see some other people's version chosen instead of your own).

Another possible explanation is that the writer's just had enough - enough money to last a lifetime, just started a family, made his mark on the world, and was no longer compelled (or have been able to) keep up with methed-up fresh college grads.

matco11 · a month ago
> remember how they mentioned they built multiple Codex prototypes, it must've sucked to see some other people's version chosen instead of your own

Well it depends on people’s mindset. It’s like doing a hackathon and not winning. Most people still leave inspired by what they have seen other people building, and can’t wait to do it again.

…but of course not everybody likes to go to hackathons

matco11 commented on A Frustrated Trump Wants His New Air Force One Planes Pronto   nytimes.com/2025/02/19/us... · Posted by u/reaperducer
bediger4000 · 6 months ago
There's two engineering aphorisms that apply here:

1. Good, fast and cheap: pick any two.

2. If you want it real bad, you're going to get it, real bad.

I suppose "Experience is was you get right after you need it" might also apply later.

matco11 · 6 months ago
Uhm. This seems more of a case of slow and expensive, can we at least hope it’s good?

The plane was initially commissioned in 2018:

- originally planned for delivery in 2024, the first aircraft’s timeline has now slipped to at least 2029, with further delays possible;

- The fixed-price contract negotiated under the (first!) Trump administration capped costs at $3.9 billion, but Boeing is already $2.5 billion over budget

https://breakingdefense.com/2024/12/first-delivery-for-air-f...

https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/25/business/air-force-one-boeing...

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/boeings-new-air-force-o...

matco11 commented on Dropbox to Reincorporate in Nevada   sec.gov/Archives/edgar/da... · Posted by u/ahakki
patrickhogan1 · 7 months ago
People will say this is about Musk and his pay package. Sure. But the more worrying precedent for someone like Drew Houston at Dropbox or Mark Zuckerberg who both have founder voting control is West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. Moelis & Co.—a Delaware case with nothing to do with Musk.

In Moelis, the Delaware Court of Chancery ruled that provisions in a Stockholder Agreement giving a founder control over board decisions were invalid under DGCL § 141(a). This could embolden challenges to founder controlled companies with a dual-class share structure.

matco11 · 7 months ago
Brilliant. Thank you for the precise reference.
matco11 commented on Nvidia’s $589B DeepSeek rout   finance.yahoo.com/news/as... · Posted by u/rcarmo
DebtDeflation · 7 months ago
In the long run (which in the AI world is probably ~1 year) this is very good for Nvidia, very good for the hyperscalers, and very good for anyone building AI applications.

The only thing it's not good for is the idea that OpenAI and/or Anthropic will eventually become profitable companies with market caps that exceed Apple's by orders of magnitude. Oh no, anyway.

matco11 · 7 months ago
Can you guys explain what this would be bad for the OpenAI and Anthropic of the world?

Wasn't the story always outlined to be we build better and better models, then we eventually get to AGI, AGI works on building better and better models even faster, and we eventually get to super AGI, which can work on building better and better models even faster... Isn't "super-optimization"(in the widest sense) what we expect to happen in the long run?

u/matco11

KarmaCake day1392June 26, 2013View Original