Readit News logoReadit News
manojlds commented on     · Posted by u/wonderfuly
stacktrace · 9 days ago
Will you consider it a stalemate if no party is able to make any further moves?
manojlds · 9 days ago
Btw a Chess Olympiad was declared drawn and shared winners after internet issues.
manojlds commented on Anthropic acquires Bun   bun.com/blog/bun-joins-an... · Posted by u/ryanvogel
simonw · 12 days ago
It doesn't read like that to me at all. This reads to me like Anthropic realizing that they have $1bn in annual revenue from Claude Code that's dependent on Bun, and acquiring Bun is a great and comparatively cheap way to remove any risk from that dependency.
manojlds · 12 days ago
Really? What risk is even there?
manojlds commented on Leak confirms OpenAI is preparing ads on ChatGPT for public roll out   bleepingcomputer.com/news... · Posted by u/fleahunter
aurareturn · 15 days ago
But the same logic applies. Youtube is not profitable without ads and would shut down.
manojlds · 14 days ago
If ChatGPT and AI is "just" supposed to be Youtube, sure. ChatGPT wasn't supposed to be just YouTube.
manojlds commented on Leak confirms OpenAI is preparing ads on ChatGPT for public roll out   bleepingcomputer.com/news... · Posted by u/fleahunter
immibis · 14 days ago
Ad money doesn't come from humans with jobs. It comes from algorithms tuned to extract money from shareholders.
manojlds · 14 days ago
What does this even mean.
manojlds commented on Chess engines didn't replace Magnus Carlsen, and AI won't replace you   coding-with-ai.dev/posts/... · Posted by u/codeclimber
jacquesm · 2 months ago
> even though they are inferior to Stockfish

They're not.

manojlds · 2 months ago
What do you mean they are not?
manojlds commented on Chess engines didn't replace Magnus Carlsen, and AI won't replace you   coding-with-ai.dev/posts/... · Posted by u/codeclimber
dchftcs · 2 months ago
This is a poor analogy. Magnus Carlsen stays because chess consumers decide to pay for humans even though they are inferior to Stockfish. BigCorp will always pick machine over you if they can.
manojlds · 2 months ago
Yeah. Coding is not a sport. Even if it is (Leetcode competitions or something), as in chess, it is the top 100 or so that can make money and survive.
manojlds commented on Claude Skills are awesome, maybe a bigger deal than MCP   simonwillison.net/2025/Oc... · Posted by u/weinzierl
djohnston · 2 months ago
What's the difference between skills and slash commands? Skills are picked up and selected implicitly by the chat? Anything else?
manojlds · 2 months ago
Did you mean explicitly?
manojlds commented on Claude Skills are awesome, maybe a bigger deal than MCP   simonwillison.net/2025/Oc... · Posted by u/weinzierl
losvedir · 2 months ago
I'm a little confused about the relationship of Skills and just plain tools. It seems like a lot of skills might just be tools. Or, they might rely on calling sets of tools with some instructions.

But aren't the tool definitions and skill definitions in different places? How do you express the dependency? Can skills say they require command line access, python, tool A, and tool B, and when you load the skill it sets those as available tool calls?

manojlds · 2 months ago
Skills seem to have code packaged in. They have added pdf, excel support using skills.
manojlds commented on Claude Skills are awesome, maybe a bigger deal than MCP   simonwillison.net/2025/Oc... · Posted by u/weinzierl
tptacek · 2 months ago
I do think the big story here is how hyperfocused and path-dependent people got on MCP, when the actually-interesting thing is simply "tool calls". Tool calls are incredibly interesting and useful. MCP is just one means to that end, and not one of the better ones.
manojlds · 2 months ago
To clarify, MCP was also a Anthropic innovation.

u/manojlds

KarmaCake day5845January 4, 2011View Original