A quack's dream come true, substantiating an argument by backsolving from its feeble or malevolent conclusion to a set of well-known premises but-with-citations. converting untenable speculation into something that passes many superficial tests of legitimacy, which is more than enough to boost it into broader and less critical visibility.
"thick with citations, therefore truthy" is a big blind spot in the casual heuristic used ro gauge the quality of a given piece of research writing, especially at the undergrad level where this tool, lets call it CheatGPT, would be stupendously popular.
-maybe we're bad at tracking calories from a decade or longer ago?
-eating too much and not knowing it?
-inactivity?
-stress du to family and job causes subtle changes that lead to weight gain
-change in gut bacteria?
-increased skin, organ, bone, and tendon/ligament mass? (non-muscle lean mass)
Some people balloon after the age of 20-30 or so, like during college or after. Look at your facebook feed of friends or family. this is way worse than just a few percent. Are scientists comepltelty oblivious to this for what is obvious to so many others?
https://discourse.threejs.org/t/threejs-and-the-transparent-...
Does that mean that in this situation OpenAI will always answer wrongly for the same question?