Readit NewsIn my fair city you're lucky to find talent under $200/hr.
Every person I've asked this question has had their noses so far up the NSA's pooper that they could not imagine considering the NSA an adversary.
But suppose you were running a malware honeypot operation for the CCP. Would you still use Ghidra? Why or why not?
And please don't pass the buck and say, "I probably wouldn't be allowed to use ghidra" or "I'd probably use whatever my CCP handler told me to use" or "I wouldn't be working for the CCP in the first place." That does not inform me about the security risks of using ghidra with the NSA as an adversary.
Good management is life and death, particularly for a startup. If you think you can do without it and you're not a good manager yourself then it's going to be a struggle to execute.
> ...you'll deeply regret building on Serverless Functions
Whatever serverless functions promise in scalability, they'll cost you in terms of complexity. Trying to build a cohesive backend entirely in a serverless environment just isn't worth it when it's trivial to boot up a simple, long-running server. Even running locally is a pain in the ass compared to `rails s` or `fastapi dev`.
God forbid your serverless environment is actually on the edge, at which point most of the stuff you're used to using won't work.