That case is from 2005. IIRC (and I did see it under construction) the WTC was built in the late 1960s/early 1970s, so I'm not sure how relevant that case might be.
Were there any lawsuits regarding eminent domain over the building of the WTC prior to its construction? I have no idea, but the 2005 case wouldn't even be relevant to the rebuild after 9/11.
This case was the result of a suit against such takings. The suit failed, and the takings continued.
"[The Court held, 5–4, that the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another private owner to further economic development does not violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment."
Now, the marketplaces are largely commoditized and new products are incremental improvements and extensions of previous ones. The old ideas and products are still there, fascinating history to be explored.
An example - on a new Linux system, look at the man page for "termcap", and you will find configuration data for the Teletype model 33 and the Lear Siegler ADM-3. That makes people like me go "Hmm!" in a fascinated tone of voice.
History is like dead reckoning navigation. We only understand where we are by knowing where we were and what was done to get from there to here, and there are those of us very interested in such things.
This is only a partial answer to your question.
https://www.boeing.com/commercial/aeromagazine/articles/qtr_...
Drag, and therefore fuel used, is a function of velocity squared. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_(physics)#Aerodynamics
Slowing down from 500 to 400 knots adds a half hour to a 1000 nm flight, but could provide maybe 25-30% fuel savings?
Tyranny of the rocket equation