Readit NewsI imagine the biggest hurdle on the path towards adopting this is writing down clear, readable prose using highly technical language. And naming things. Using ambiguous human language to describe a complex algorithm without causing a conflict in a big team.
If said junk was alpha- or beta-emitting, it could be enough of a danger for cancer.
What's the benefit of this? Curious if anyone has a solid viewpoint steelmanning any positives they can think of.
... I wear socks. There's a lot of things holding back my climbing, proper diet, weight training, sticking to a plan, etc... socks are not holding me back pahaha.
I don't see at a glance how it's bleach infused as the packaging claims.
Indeed. All it takes is a world government and tight surveillance and enforcement and for sure human behavior can be controlled.
Still, who controlls the controller?
Their shoes should be banned under the Geneva convention.
That means that, with the current technology, there can never be a deterministic agent.
Now obviously, humans aren't deterministic either, but the error bars are a lot closer together than they are with LLMs these days.
An easy to point at example is the coding agent that removed someones home directory that was circulating around. I'm not saying a human has never done that, but it's far less likely because it's so far out of the realm of normal operations.
So as of today, we need humans in the loop. And this is understood by the people making these products. That's why they have all these permissions and prompts for you to accept/run commands and all of that.