IMO these issues occur any time you have third party software that does the job the operating system should be doing itself. Backup/snapshot software (this should be a feature of the file system), clipboard software (the OS clipboard should cover these needs), hot key software, window management, “anti cheat” (or really anything that needs to be a kernel module), antivirus, antimalware, the list goes on.
A properly architected system should have an operating system in charge of managing apps and resources and hardware, and apps which mind their own business. Cross-cutting “horizontal” stuff like what Acronis is doing here are reimplementing things your OS should be doing, and thus aren’t tested along with the OS itself, and are bound to have issues like these.
Or you run macOS and the first party stuff is so buggy (spotlight I’m looking at you) that you’re screwed either way.
There's no winning here.
For SOHO yes, where no serious database usage is expected. But server/datacenter SSDs are categorized: read-intensive, write-intensive and mixed-usage.
As an example in this Micron product brief the Latency for the read-intensive vs mixed use product are the same: https://assets.micron.com/adobe/assets/urn:aaid:aem:e71d9e5e...
Of course the footnote says that latency is a median at QD=1 random 4K IO.
From the paper the PM9A3 which is 1 DWPD has better P99.9 write latency under load vs the 7450 Pro (3 DWPD mixed use).