I remember having to painfully sit through multi-hour presentations in which they'd explain how to use a hamburger menu to find the app settings, and half the participants furiously scribbled down notes so they wouldn't get lost later when they needed to find the settings without guidance, on their home computer.
This was only a decade ago and I doubt it's much better now. People who go into teaching aren't exactly the best & brightest most of the time. And the results speak for themselves.
Considering the ensuing reception and general avoidance of the semantic web outside academic papers, I guess no one wants to talk about it.
> Individuals and interactions over processes and tools
> Working software over comprehensive documentation
> Customer collaboration over contract negotiation
> Responding to change over following a plan
I would read it, but I am running late for my daily standup and haven’t finished updating JIRA yet to document my progress since yesterday’s standup.
I'm not saying this is the outcome of an Agile approach, but sure seems common on the Scrum projects I work on.
On the other hand there's zero desire at Google to try and build the best phone. They have conceded that to Apple a long time ago.
No desire to be number one in Cloud. They are fighting for number 3 spot.
They are the Xerox of AI with a full stack solution. If they had the drive they would be HYPING THE SHIT out of TPU and making it the best solution to run all the real workloads people have.
Guess what. On average a Googler even still today with low bar to entry is probably 10 IQ points higher than average Amazon or Microsoft or Apple. But no; no drive.
While knowledge graphs are useful in many ways, personally I wouldn't use Neo4J to build a knowledge graph as it doesn't really play to any of their strengths.
Also, I would rather stab myself with a fork than try to use Cypher to query a concept graph when better standards-based options are available.
I am seeing great value in AI-based solutions related to knowledge assistants and for automation N(A). Neither of these seem like strong suites for CoPilot, but it's very early days.
That we're seeing much better results using self-hosted open source models (Llama 3.1, etc.) should be concerning for Microsoft as well.