To me the latter always sounds very unsophisticated.
Admitting that you need at least two full-time engineers working on Kubernetes I wonder how that kind of investment pay’s itself back, especially because of all the added complexity.
I desperately would like to rebuild their environment on regular VMs, maybe not even containerized and understand what the infrastructure cost would have been. And what the maintenance burden would have been as compared to kubernetes.
Maybe it’s not about pure infrastructure cost but about the development-to-production pipeline. But still.
These is just so much context that seems relevant to understand if an investment in kubernetes is warranted or not.
> This is very context-specific, but depending on the node type, AKS reserves about ~10-30% of the available memory (for internal AKS services)
25% of the first 4GB of memory, 20% of the next 4GB of memory (up to 8GB), 10% of the next 8GB of memory (up to 16GB), 6% of the next 112GB of memory (up to 128GB), 2% of any memory above 128GB
"AKS reserves an additional 2GB for system process in Windows nodes that are not part of the calculated memory."
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/aks/concepts-cluster...