Readit NewsI grew up in a town that had a community center where kids of my age played in bands, learned crocheting etc. School was boring, but it was short, and it was easy to meet with other kids from other schools, including other towns. Kids doing classical music have the same experience in general I think.
Historically, most of my SO usage boils down to: 1) finding how to implement something esoteric that results in finding a clever solution or a under described feature flag in a function/tool 2) finding a workaround bugfix for a broken feature in some software (>70% of the time finding link to a github issue in the description
If we consider that LLMs are functionally an information retrieval function containing natural language program subroutines. In this context, a web-browser enabled LLM should be able to determine go to source and return a functional answer on a model that is not pretrained on the source.
So as long as there is good documentation on a particular piece of software, we should theoretically be able to generalize to non-existing tools. At least long enough for there to be a newly-created training dataset from people hitting the problem for the first time.
Side note: In some sense, the foundation model labs are aggregating the Question-Answer pairs (typically from stackoverflow) from their user data. I wouldn't be surprised if they created a stackoverflow clone at some point to opensource the dataset creation and labeling efforts.
This is basically what community notes is for X and now Facebook
It sounds like they were never able to bridge the gap of turning the casual interest of folks expressing their counter-culture into enough money to survive. To their credit, it's much better to recognize when they did that the utopian experiment wasn't a viable business, than to try to drag more funds out of folks to keep it on life-support.
That's a big deal to some, no doubt, but it's important to be precise about language in cases like this, especially since folks will undoubtedly assume that this means secret user-hostile things will now be embedded in the source code, sight-unseen.
Seriously though - this entire outage is the poster child for why you NEVER have software that updates without explicit permission from a sysadmin. If I were in congress, I would make it illegal, it's an obvious national security issue.
Who's going to take the risk of appearing to have sat on an important update, while the org they support is ravaged by ThreatOfTheDay, because they thought they knew better than a multi-billion dollar, tops-in-their-field company?
(I'm not necessarily saying that's actually objectively correct, but I can't imagine that many folks are willing to risk the downside)
https://proton.me/about/impact
And you don't even need to be a dissident in "one of those countries". As long as Europol's arm (or some other organization that Swiss is part of) can reach you, you are not covered, as in https://restoreprivacy.com/protonmail-logs-users/
I don't have an opinion on whether this is ok or not (protecting dissidents and protecting "real" criminals), I am just sick of false advertising.
It is because of these reasons I chose Fastmail over Proton when I was looking for an alternative. The E2EE itself is almost bogus, and I would rather look for othet features that I need.
And in what way would FastMail not be impacted by analogous events? https://www.itnews.com.au/news/fastmail-loses-customers-face...
I do agree that the value of email encryption for 99% of users is overstated, given the fundamental nature of email communications to begin with.
Deleted Comment
I've gotten nothing but benefits from living in neighborhoods with HOAs. Basic stuff like funding for landscapers to keep up the shared grassy areas along the streets, to plowing the access roads in winter time. But the main benefit has always been that it provides a legal mechanism to force everyone to maintain their yards and property. No need to drop passive-aggressive notes in a mailbox about people parking their cars on their lawns.
10/10 highly recommend
edit: apparently you guys don't like HOAs haha. Well I love them. Keeps the neighborhood from looking like a dump.
I've seen both - folks who are good stewards of the community's money and add to its energy, and folks who can't manage money and exhaust the community's energy on trivialities.