They are just spraying and praying with their ads on best guesses as to what is relevant to you.
How is this a lawsuit?
It's a case brought strategically in order to trigger certain questions of interpretation of GDPR rules to be litigated.
Schrems' specific claim only needs to hold enough water to give him standing to get the case through enough filters in the court system to facilitate this.
They showed that people running to catch a ball would follow an inefficient curved path as a result of this, rather than actually calculating where the ball will land and moving there in a straight line to intercept it.