Readit News logoReadit News
jliptzin commented on Hurricane category 6 could be introduced under new storm severity scale   livescience.com/planet-ea... · Posted by u/geox
wtallis · a day ago
If you live on the coast, following the details of the forecasts and warnings is extremely important. But my experience living a little over 100 miles inland taught me that the hurricane category is a useful predictor to some extent: anything below category 3 would weaken enough on its way inland that it wasn't a higher risk than routine severe thunderstorms, and didn't require any special advance preparations. The winds would merely be coming from a different direction than usual for our area, and only the areas usually prone to flash flooding had to worry about the volume of rain. It's location-specific, but it is possible to usefully distill the local risk profile down to something where the hurricane category tells you whether it's time to start worrying about that storm.
jliptzin · 15 hours ago
You don’t sound like the average person; perhaps you could even be a local authority :)
jliptzin commented on Hurricane category 6 could be introduced under new storm severity scale   livescience.com/planet-ea... · Posted by u/geox
varenc · a day ago
I think you’re in total agreement with the authors of this new system. They’re simply making a new categorization system that is closer to a 1:1 mapping between the classification and what local authorities are saying about potential danger.

It's easier to make the classification a better representation of danger than it is to convince people to ignore the rating and only listen to local authorities.

jliptzin · 15 hours ago
That’s true
jliptzin commented on Hurricane category 6 could be introduced under new storm severity scale   livescience.com/planet-ea... · Posted by u/geox
jliptzin · a day ago
The average person should not even really pay attention to the category of the storm. That is mostly of scientific concern. It measures the maximum wind speed found at the relatively tiny center of circulation which may or may not have anything to do with how destructive the rest of the storm is hundreds of miles away from the center, as the article points out. That can also depend on things that have nothing to do with the storm itself, such as whether it’s impacting an area with lax building codes that is unprepared for storm surge. People should forget about that scale and focus on what local authorities are saying about the potential danger.
jliptzin commented on Hawley and Democrats vote to advance congressional stock trading ban   cbsnews.com/news/hawley-d... · Posted by u/hhs
t-3 · a month ago
I support the idea, but I don't think it will make much of a difference because there are bound to be too many loopholes to be effective. I think stock market reform would be more effective - ban calls and puts and other forms of speculation. Speculation invites manipulation and incentivizes unethical actions, especially when paired with power and information. The best, but least realistically possible, thing would be to fix the problems with regulatory capture in the SEC and other oversight and enforcement agencies that are supposed to be punishing politicians.
jliptzin · a month ago
Options can be used for speculation but they are also frequently used to reduce risk/exposure. Covered calls and married puts are just a couple of such strategies frequently used by retail investors. We shouldn’t ban those tools just to prevent political corruption. We should be enforcing the law when it comes to insider trading and market manipulation much more effectively.
jliptzin commented on Andrew Ng: Building Faster with AI [video]   youtube.com/watch?v=RNJCf... · Posted by u/sandslash
lhuser123 · 2 months ago
And make it more complicated than K8s
jliptzin · 2 months ago
Not possible
jliptzin commented on Mary Meeker's first Trends report since 2019, focused on AI   bondcap.com/reports/tai... · Posted by u/kjhughes
jliptzin · 3 months ago
You can use AI for that
jliptzin commented on Trump exempts phones, computers, chips from ‘reciprocal’ tariffs   bloomberg.com/news/articl... · Posted by u/tosh
spaceman_2020 · 5 months ago
If I was charitable to Trump, I would think that he genuinely wants to move manufacturing back to the US, and is likely being supported by the military faction of the government. There is a decent chance of a hot war with China in the future, and you really can’t win wars if you can’t build stuff at home quickly. As things currently stand, China can vastly out produce America in the event of a war
jliptzin · 5 months ago
A war with China would be over in about 15 min with both sides utterly destroyed
jliptzin commented on A recent study suggests that insects branched out from crustaceans   smithsonianmag.com/scienc... · Posted by u/Carrok
dang · 5 months ago
[stub for offtopicness]
jliptzin · 5 months ago
Smithsonian funding must really be drying up if they have to assault me with 40 pop up ads per sentence
jliptzin commented on How the Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg Got Added to the White House Signal Chat   theguardian.com/us-news/2... · Posted by u/howard941
ttul · 5 months ago
Nothing in my comment implies that what Clinton did was any more lawful. But since you raised the point, I’ll just note that it is quite interesting that Clinton’s circumstance was thoroughly investigated by the FBI, whereas in the Signal debacle, it seems Trump’s administration is going to let it go.

Why the double standard?

jliptzin · 5 months ago
Why would Trump fire anyone? Voters have signaled that they no longer care how classified information is handled. Maybe they no longer know why classified information should be carefully guarded, or it's just not a priority anymore. We all remember the FBI's photos of top secret documents being stashed in the Mar a Lago bathroom and ballroom. Not only did Trump not face any consequences for that whatsoever, he actually gained votes compared to the last time he ran. Trump is behaving completely rationally here. He's not going to lose even 1% of his support base over this, so why would he take any action? It's pretty interesting that for all the decades of skepticism and distrust of the government I've heard coming from conservatives (2A to guard against tyranny, "government is the problem", etc), they're putting an awful lot of blind trust in this particular administration.
jliptzin commented on Trump's Tariffs Wipe Out over $6T on Wall Street in Epic Two-Day Rout   wsj.com/finance/stocks/u-... · Posted by u/perihelions
ViktorRay · 5 months ago
In the long run it could lead to more fair trade deals.

Today’s episode of Newshour at the BBC World Service had a conversation between a BBC journalist and a German CDU politician where they talked about how the tariffs on cars from Germany entering America has historically been lower than the tariffs on cars from America entering Germany. The CDU politician was telling the BBC that he hoped maybe a resolution for all of this would be both America and Europe lowering their tariffs to zero.

That was the hope of that politician in the long run though. In the short run the politician was in a sad mood because he felt things economically are going to be bad for everybody.

jliptzin · 5 months ago
Trump himself has said the tariffs are to raise revenue in order to get rid of income and corporate taxes. But now they’re also a negotiating tool to eventually remove all tariffs with our trade partners? That makes no sense

u/jliptzin

KarmaCake day5023July 22, 2012
About
Full-stack developer, entrepreneur, and news junkie.
View Original