US competition laws are outdated with undue reliance on the concept of a monopoly.
I don't care if you're a monopoly or a third of the market or even a small company. If you run a marketplace or app store or similar platform, you should NOT be able to:
- Force usage of a separate product of yours over/with competitors (in this case, Apple sign-in, but also Apple Pay instead of Google Pay, etc.)
- Prevent competing products from appearing (whether Apple not allowing other browser rendering engines, Amazon not allowing Google Home or Chromecast to be sold, etc.)
- Rank your own items higher in search results etc. if competitors can't bid to do the same e.g. sponsored results for everyone including yourself (so Amazon Basics or Google Shopping needs to be listed as a sponsored result, not as a separate feature)
This is the kind of thing 21st-century legislation for fair competition should address.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Antitrust_Paradox
Essentially, the book advocates that the only goal antitrust laws should have is to protect consumer welfare, not competitors.
IMO, Apple’s requirement doesn’t feel like it would harm consumer welfare.
These kinds of models are pretty to look at but rapidly fall apart when you play with base assumptions. The only way to absorb this data is to have an interactive set of adjusters to base data possibilities.
https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Publications/Files/Key_Findings_...
Edit: Another question I have is how do other devices handle battery degradation? Do Android phones just let devices shutdown unexpectedly or is there also performance throttling? Or is the problem non-existent on non-Apple devices somehow?
[1] https://www.geekbench.com/blog/2017/12/iphone-performance-an...
1 a working phone
2 a valid credit card
To use azure which places a too high bar on students. I mean I've tried to argue for graduated restrictions so basically students with .edu emails should be able to do some things without entering a credit card number but the fact that it is not possible suggests this isn't a priority for azure.
Google says this finds on your browser so there's little infrastructure cost for this demo, right?
- Work or school account
- Personal account
I get this prompt every time I try to log into Azure with my work email. If I choose the work account (the most intuitive option) my azure subscription list is empty. I have to log out and select the other option.
Why is there a difference and why isn't this transparent? I am authenticated, you know who I am, give me access to the things I'm authorized for. I don't know what kind of weird backend situation MS has, but asking me to understand it is terrible UX.
This was a mistake and has been patched. But it looks like an MSA was created using the same email as your AAD before the fix.
Thus, from MS's perspective, there are two distinct accounts under the same email, hence the UX. It's really quite a mess, and yes the situation is weird. We're working on it make it better.
Try transferring the subscriptions to your work email using this method https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/billing/billing-subsc...
[1] https://feedback.azure.com/forums/217298-storage/suggestions...
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/acoat/2016/01/28/publish-a-...
EDIT: also http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31653643/how-to-deploy-a-...
https://www.quora.com/Who-can-see-what-you-publish-and-comme...