Having to iterate through your windows is not optimal. I use sway, with windows divided across workspaces. So if I want to switch to my web browser I hit super+1. If I want to switch to my code editor I hit super+2. If I want to switch to my terminal(s) I hit super+3. I use 4 through 0 for other random windows (for example, I usually launch games or videos on 0. If I'm working in two code bases I generally put the editor and terminal for the 2nd code base on 4 and 5).
What takes you O(n) takes me only O(1).
I have thousands deadlines which are suddenly coming due and a bunch of code which is broken because some poor soul under the same pressure put something that "works" in. And it worked, until it didn't, and now it's my turn in the barrel.
Is this the joy?
I'm not complaining, I'm doing it for the good money.
Does the problem persist with contact lenses? Soft contact lenses can do a better job of correcting vision for someone with keratosis, as they conform to the wonky surface of the cornea.
Edit: Just realised you're probably doing market research rather than asking for yourself. Either way, people with keratosis, who don't fit into the box, might be something to consider.
Odd critique. Microsoft could do whatever, it was Crowdstrike who "raw dogged" the update to customers without any meaningful staging.