But you can buy a large box of generic and very cheap no-bullshit pods at Costco, and simply put two or even three of them in a load.
If you're going the multi-pod route, you can put one in the dispenser and one or more right in with the dishes.
All of these eager claims to replace humans feel violently antisocial. (And in many instances hypocritical if coming from people who defensively claim “it's just a tool”…)
echo 1 2 3 | each "rm {}"
is the same as rm 1
rm 2
rm 3
while echo 1 2 3 | xargs rm
is the same as rm 1 2 3
I would rather say that 'each' replaces (certain uses of) 'for': for i in 1 2 3; do rm $i; done -I replace-str
Replace occurrences of replace-str in the initial-arguments
with names read from standard input. Also, unquoted blanks
do not terminate input items; instead the separator is the
newline character. Implies -x and -L 1.I'd love a rebrand or rename in order to avoid having to work around the name collision.
Best of luck!
Would you mind going into more detail on what actually happens when you move horizontally? What happens when you have a fullscreen editor, then slide over to a half-screen browser? Do you only see half the editor, or does the editor get squished?
One thing I desperately want is a tiling wm that is also a browser. Like if surf ran a practical engine and was more deeply integrated into dmenu.