I would expect it to be "done", or maybe could be refined with a couple more little things, but definitely not needing full-time dedication on making a version 2.0 or adding new features.
Aren't we going to end up with a new react?
It's especially poor when you consider that publishing apps on Google Play means a one-off fee for your account, but publishing apps on Apple's App Store requires an annual subscription, with TSI credits on top of it.
At least you can say with Google that you get what you pay for in terms of support and experience (not much—it's passable), can't say the same for Apple.
Similar to Apple, I'd happily pay a yearly fee for better support with the Google developer program
All this article says is that hackernews likes interesting, informative posts that actually tell a real story. And I for one am here for that all day. So yes, everyone take this strategy and make great content.
So I'm not extremely thrilled because I purchased a software that was perfectly fine until someone decided it was not, but you could say that's the price of progress, maybe? What I hate is that a license purchase is no longer available. I must pay for a membership. And with it they're also removing the "standalone vaults", so the possibility of owning my data and storing it wherever I want. I must now upload all my passwords to the cloud.
Edit: I know at least 1Password and Bitwarden do that for you.