Readit NewsInhabited areas everywhere and non-inhabited areas everywhere have had an extreme growth in wildfire.
The gains stay the same be cause they were examples to other human-apes with other invisiible-line kingdoms.
Sum totals for the coal spewing nations and states among us are far worse.
Anything innovated must come from outside or have a very close permutation to be found.
Generative AI isn't scary at all now. It is merely rolling dice on a mix of other tech and rumors from the internet.
The data can be wrong or old...and people keep important secrets.
I think it shows great promise as a way to sidestep the ethical concerns (and the reproducibility issues) associated with traditional psychology research.
One idea in this space I think a lot about is from the Google paper on curiosity and procrastination in reinforcement learning: https://research.google/blog/curiosity-and-procrastination-i...
Basically the idea is that you can model curiosity as a reward signal proportional to your prediction error. They do an experiment where they train an ML system to explore a maze using curiosity, and it performs the task more efficiently -- UNTIL they add a "screen" in the maze that shows random images. In this case, the agent maximizes the curiosity reward by just staring at the screen.
Feels a little too relatable sometimes, as a highly curious person with procrastination issues :)
A million more layers of "freeing" yourself and you are back to where you started every time.
An ape granting all impulsive choices the ability to undo anything long-term at all.
Futility is a real thing for some dreamers to accept... but plan-less-ness is not freedom.
It is bondage to short-sighted repeated failure.
It could easily be a compiler-based protection: any opcode that can generate it from two/one normal input must be checked for normal results.
This is similar to how C++ gives few guarantees but "new" and "this" never give null or unallocated values.
If the next revolution is going to be capital intensive (ML at present) then you dont need to lock up engineering talent.
Cull all the staff you don't need, they aren't going to build your next competitor, they cant afford to.
Draining capital into the wrong ones will be common and easy. Then the bubbles will burst and we will see how much raw capital and debt actually pay out.
The term "conspiracy theory" was invented by the CIA after Kennedy's head exploded shortly after he started to move to withdraw from Vietnam.
It was later used on people who didn't buy the Iraq WMD story.
It was used on people who suspected mass government spying before Snowden proved them right.
Recently it was used for people who thought a US funded biolab experimenting with making bat coronaviruses miles from the epicenter of a coronavirus outbreak was suspicious.
You can try to censor untrue things but censoring "conspiracy loonies" means sticking to the mainstream narratives, for that you can go on Reddit and watch CNN.
You remember all those? Strange. Thst seems to be blocked from you reading it.
That is a new argument, coming from health care is a right and good for society?
It’s kinda crazy you want to dismiss this simply because it benefits some group of people you don’t like.
In any se your argument is this is worse. And I argue this is good, fair and meritocratic , and sustainable.
While the USA has wealth, you can simply expand your idea beyond the walked garden of a single country and to the world stage. There is no way with today’s tech and cost of labor could we ever give free health care to everybody. World wide there are far more people who exist, than people who exist and contribute back to society.
The dream of unlimited free healthcare can only be archived once > 90% of humans are producing more than they consume, which war are no where near even in the richest of rich, the USA.