I've been building over the past 3 years & just recently monetized and crossed the $500/m mark through a Pro subscription. It's grown into a lovely community of people who help each other pick their best pictures for dating apps, professional photos etc.
I've seen some pretty fun novel use cases, such as (multiple!) people using it to pick out glasses, wedding invites & so on
-- https://apps.apple.com/us/app/rankpic-photo-ranking/id160299... (ios)
-- https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=app.rankpic.ra... (android)
It checks out, sales/consulting folks are pretty infamous for their tendency to abuse metrics. The metric here is npm downloads and Github stars.
The strategy does mean that he's _technically_ not inaccurate in claiming this on his LinkedIn -
> NASA, Microsoft, Google, AMEX, Target, IBM, Apple, Facebook, Airbus, Mercedes, Salesforce, and hundreds of thousands of other organizations depend on code I wrote to power their developer tools and consumer applications.
I encountered this type a lot in college consulting groups, it's a little funny seeing one make their way to the OSS community.
This dude is counting each one as a project hahaha
I'd have to go out of my way to type like that, on mobile or at a workstation.
Regulate use of artificial intelligence on MBA- covered projects: AI-generated written material is not considered literary material, source material or assigned material under the MBA.
AI is not a writer under the MBA.
Writer can elect to use AI when performing writing services, if Company consents and provided writer follows applicable company policies. Company cannot require writer to use AI software (e.g., ChatGPT) when performing writing services.
Company must disclose to writer if any material given to writer has been generated by AI or incorporates AI-generated material.
Guild reserves right to assert that exploitation of writers’ material to train AI is prohibited by MBA or other law.
----------------------------
Notably, the demand "MBA-covered material can’t be used to train AI" appears not to be part of the tentative agreement.
Seems like a loophole: a company could increase the workload to the point GPT tools are needed and claim a writer is not performing (when compared to a writer that does use GPT).