Readit News logoReadit News
iseletsk commented on CEOs are hugely expensive. Why not automate them? (2021)   newstatesman.com/business... · Posted by u/nis0s
iseletsk · a month ago
As a founder/CEO who started as a programmer, I have been running my second company for 15 years. I am not great, but I got the company to be sizable and profitable.

1. I will take five automated CEOs. If I can split my company into five distinct companies (one per product), it would be amazing. We are splitting the company into two to streamline focus on different/incompatible industries, and I am dreading the process of finding another CEO. It is very, very hard.

2. I know a lot of CEOs. It helps. I didn't know a single one when I started. It is no more a cult than my programmer's peer group was.

3. Did I tell you how hard it is to find a good CEO? It is VERY, VERY hard. Think of hiring a great product guy with agency to do whatever needs to be done, with people skills to attract talent, a sales drive, and a willingness to deal with finance & legal. Oh, and I am in the tech field, so I need him to be very hardcore technical. Your mileage might vary, but this is who I need. Anyone who has that is running their own companies. Oh, and the person has to have a proven track record. I cannot let someone unproven ruin the company and well-being of hundreds of employees and tens of thousands of customers.

4. I don't believe CEOs are special in any way other than that most other professionals are special. There are probably some underlying qualities, but they're all so different.

5. Some CEOs got there because they were lucky, but they didn't stay there for long because of luck. It is very, very simple to screw up as a CEO.

6. Growing someone within an organization to become a CEO is very hard. We are trying - giving some people more and more responsibilities, trying to involve them in more and more aspects of the organization. The filter is - repeatable success. You don't have to succeed all the time, but you have to succeed most of the time. Most people don't want the pressure, aren't interested in certain aspects, or are unsuccessful more often than they should.

7. Boards are not a cult as well; they don't have CEO's back. Boards are represented by investors (pension funds, wealthy individuals, etc.) - they will oust the CEO if the company's performance suffers. They are willing to pay a lot to the CEO because ... it is so hard to find a good CEO.

iseletsk commented on A new threat: Being replaced by someone who knows AI   wsj.com/tech/ai/ai-work-u... · Posted by u/zerosizedweasle
pixodaros · 3 months ago
You didn't have to punish athletes to make them wear Nike and Adidas shoes, because they were obviously better than plain sneakers. You didn't have to punish graphic artists to make them use tablets because they are so convenient for digital art. But a lot of bosses are convinced that if their staff don't find these tools useful for their tasks, its the line workers who are wrong.
iseletsk · 3 months ago
People wouldn't keep using old shoes, and I am old enough to remember graphic artists who wouldn't use computers. It takes time. At some point, it will be a no-brainer. Yet, it will not be simply because method A is so much better than method B. It will be because people using method B change, retire, or are fired.
iseletsk commented on Inside Amazon's engineering culture: Lessons from their senior principals   olshansky.substack.com/p/... · Posted by u/Olshansky
whatever1 · 3 months ago
Neither France nor Germany have access to the high-risk capital that American startups enjoy.

Layoff protections and entrepreneurship in this case have a correlation but not a causation relationship.

If your thesis was correct startups would thrive in States with absolutely zero protections, yet the most successful tech startups are in the most “stringent” (for American standards) State. California.

iseletsk · 3 months ago
California prohibits non-competes, which is one of the reasons why so many new start-ups are created here. So, while it is not the most 'business' state, it is actually very startup-friendly.
iseletsk commented on Inside Amazon's engineering culture: Lessons from their senior principals   olshansky.substack.com/p/... · Posted by u/Olshansky
some_guy_nobel · 3 months ago
> In what way? Demanding that people who are being paid $200k-400k TC need to execute and show that they can execute is something which needed to be done in the tech industry.

Where does this come from? Maybe if you're drinking whatever (toxic) koolaid Amazon gave you, but Amazon has a lower profit-per-employee than Docusign: https://www.trueup.io/revenue-per-employee

Not exactly the steward of execution you think it is.

iseletsk · 3 months ago
Does it include warehouse workers?
iseletsk commented on PSF has withdrawn $1.5M proposal to US Government grant program   pyfound.blogspot.com/2025... · Posted by u/lumpa
rectang · 4 months ago
Anti-DEI forces, once in power, turn out not to favor putative “diversity of opinion” after all.
iseletsk · 4 months ago
No one takes them to jail; companies and organizations can run however they want, unless they break laws. It doesn't mean that the government that runs and wins on an anti-DEI agenda should give them money.
iseletsk commented on PSF has withdrawn $1.5M proposal to US Government grant program   pyfound.blogspot.com/2025... · Posted by u/lumpa
japhyr · 4 months ago
> DEI is an immoral, hate based and anti-truth ideology.

Much of the DEI work stems from people looking around a decade or so ago at tech conferences, and noticing that they were almost entirely comprised of men.

There's way too much to address in a single comment, so I'll share one specific thing the Python community has done over the past ten+ years that's made a world of difference: The talk proposal process has been standardized so identifying information is hidden in the first round of reviews.

That one change helped shift the dial from almost entirely male speaker lineups to a much more balanced speaker lineup. As a result, we get a much broader range of talks.

There is nothing "immoral, hate based, and anti-truth" about efforts like this.

iseletsk · 4 months ago
PSF made their own choice based on their own politics and optics. Note that requirements had nothing against diversity or fairness. It was fairly specific: "discriminatory equity ideology in violation of Federal anti-discrimination laws."

DEI was weaponized in the USA, where in quite a few instances, people couldn't get promoted or hired because of their race (typically white or asian). It was about preferential treatment, where you would get hired because of your race, and not merit.

I am all for diversity, I am all for fairness, and I don't think we should exclude people based on the color of their skin or their socioeconomic status. Yet, that is exactly what DEI did, and I have seen it firsthand many, many times.

PSF is just being stupid (or pragmatic) about it.

iseletsk commented on State Terror, American Style   paulkrugman.substack.com/... · Posted by u/rbanffy
iseletsk · 4 months ago
I visited Portland a month ago. There are security guards at each pharmacy and supermarket. I got screamed at by a violent/homeless person because I walked on her block. Some streets - and we are talking downtown/center - I was just afraid or disgusted to walk on. So, yes, Portland is a dump that needs to get cleaned up.
iseletsk commented on X still struggles to grow subscription revenue   techcrunch.com/2024/10/15... · Posted by u/LorenDB
iseletsk · a year ago
X is much more fun now. I am not subjected to my own bubble, and I see opinions different from mine, which I often find irritating. Yet, given that I want to get out of the bubble and see opinions different from mine, X works wonders for me.
iseletsk commented on AlmaLinux 9.4 less than one week after RHEL 9.4, with added hardware support   almalinux.org/blog/2024-0... · Posted by u/bennyvasquez
codyro · 2 years ago
So to be certain, using these drivers in subsequent releases should be done with caution.

Are there any plans to add testing for these specific drivers/hardware?

iseletsk · 2 years ago
If people donate hardware - probably yes. If people with such hardware would be willing to run tests, then probably yes. Otherwise - my guess would be no, no specific testing for such drivers would be made.
iseletsk commented on AlmaLinux 9.4 less than one week after RHEL 9.4, with added hardware support   almalinux.org/blog/2024-0... · Posted by u/bennyvasquez
codyro · 2 years ago
What level of support is being guaranteed to the drivers that upstream has stopped supporting? If a bug crops up, does AlmaLinux intend to patch things in-house?

Disclaimer: I volunteer my time at AlmaLinux/am part of the project.

iseletsk · 2 years ago
I don't think there would be any guarantees, as it is a free product. So, it would be based on things like the availability of patches upstream (kernel.org), and how many people need the fix, as well as how much effort you are contributing to the fix (be it testing, willing to replicate the issue, etc...)

u/iseletsk

KarmaCake day35February 3, 2016View Original