Deleted Comment
If it's owned by a few, as it is right now, it's an existential threat to the life, liberty, and pursuit of a happiness of everyone else on the planet.
We should be seriously considering what we're going to do in response to that threat if something doesn't change soon.
I think this should be an axiom which should be respected by any copyright rule.
Workflows means some organization signed off on what has to be done. Checklists, best practices, etc.
Agents on the other hand have a goal and you have no idea or what they’re going to do to achieve it. I think of an agent’s guardrails as essentially a “blacklist” of actions, while a workflow is a “whitelist”.
To me, agents are a gimmick the same way that real-time chat, or video, is a gimmick. It is good for entertainment but actually has negative value for getting actual work done.
Think of it this way… just as models have a tradeoff between explore and exploit, the agents can be considered as capable of exploration while the workflows exploit best practices. Over time and many tasks, everything is standardized into best practices, so the agents become worse than completely standardized workflows. They may be useful to tinker at the edges but not to make huge decisions. Like maybe agents can be used to set up some personalized hooks for users at the edges of some complex system.
https://medium.com/@falkgottlob/many-ai-agents-are-actually-...
To summarize: It seems that LLM are not able to give correct result for simple math problems (here a double integral on a triangle). So students should not rely on them since nowaday they are not able to perform simple task without many errors.