Readit NewsWe then went wild buying shirts for the family, a sticker (stuck currently on the water filter in the living room), a mug which was supposed to be mine but which my son guards as a precious possession, and a giant wall tapestry to hang in my son's room. I actually wasn't sure all of those were going to come out, but even on the sticker, you can make out the individual cells in the more complex designs. Anyway - we enjoy these things on a daily basis.
We're kinda a bunch of math geeks. My husband and I both have masters degrees in the field, and our son, I guess, is a demonstration of what you can accomplish with selective breeding. ;) We have a lot of mathematical curiosities around the house, most of them homemade - penrose and hat tile fridge magnets, klein bottles, constant width solids, representations of projective tuning space. You know, the usual.
Other enthusiasts in the (very niche) space enjoy seeing the graphic. Since the time of creation, math has advanced, with these no longer being the smallest or best examples of some of these loops. This is exciting for all of us - the advance of mathematics is usually not this accessible. :)
I thought for a longtime it was some joke I wasn't getting related to deities smithing people.
That's "deities smiting people.", but I really like the idea of deities smithing people :)
https://github.com/topics/windows-11-debloat
I think I used this guide https://christitus.com/windows-11-perfect-install/
I agree that the word "society" can be used to convey social norms, whether imposed by the general public or a powerful minority, but here it's use is deceptive, because there is a connotation that society at large accepts this application of law as just, and had the practical power to influence copyright law.
<noscript>
<center>
<b>notice</b>
<p>javascript required to view this site</p>
<b>why</b>
<p>measured improvement in server performance</p>
<p>awesome incremental search</p>
</center>
</noscript>Much easier to do that supporting both HTTP and JS for both read and write.
It is an interesting change, to a more federated style.
I ended up doing a small project inspired by this change, at https://github.com/dexen/tlb
Linking to a specific topic.
Archiving the site.
So, if your proof is correct, and your description of the (language/CPU) is correct, you can prove the code does what you think it does.
Formal proof systems are still growing up, though, and they are still pretty hard to use. See Coq for an introduction: https://coq.inria.fr/
An exception would be better. Then you immediately get at the first problem instead of having to track down the lifetime of the observed problem to find the first problem.