Readit News logoReadit News
imdsm commented on LLMs as the new high level language   federicopereiro.com/llm-h... · Posted by u/swah
kaapipo · 2 days ago
If we can treat the prompts as the versionable source code artefact, then sure. But as long as we need to fine-tune the output that's not a high level language. In the same way no one would edit the assembly that a compiler produces
imdsm · 2 days ago
If we're able to produce an LLM which takes a seed and produces the same output per input, then we'd be able to do this
imdsm commented on Antirender: remove the glossy shine on architectural renderings   antirender.com/... · Posted by u/iambateman
imdsm · 10 days ago
And it's broken
imdsm commented on Reading across books with Claude Code   pieterma.es/syntopic-read... · Posted by u/gmays
hungryhobbit · 25 days ago
I don't think the Venn diagram of those people and everyone else is as separate as you imagine.

I'm a Literature major and avid reader, but projects like this are still incredibly exciting to me. I salivate at the thought of new kinds of literary analysis that AI is going to open up.

imdsm · 25 days ago
the people most likely to analyse books like this are those of us who are more likely to read them as well
imdsm commented on Reading across books with Claude Code   pieterma.es/syntopic-read... · Posted by u/gmays
stavros · 25 days ago
I need a name for people who dismiss an entirely new and revolutionary class of technology without even trying it, so much so that they'll not even read about any new ideas that involve it.
imdsm · 25 days ago
we call them luddites
imdsm commented on Reading across books with Claude Code   pieterma.es/syntopic-read... · Posted by u/gmays
gjm11 · 25 days ago
I agree that we should be reading books with our eyes and that feeding a book into an LLM doesn't constitute reading it and confers few of the same benefits.

But this thing isn't (so far as I can tell) even slightly proposing that we feed books into an LLM instead of reading them. It looks to me more like a discovery mechanism: you run this thing, it shows you some possible links between books, and maybe you think "hmm, that little snippet seems well written" or "well, I enjoyed book X, let's give book Y a try" or whatever.

I don't think it would work particularly well for me; I'd want longer excerpts to get a sense of whether a book is interesting, and "contains a fragment that has some semantic connection with a fragment of a book I liked" doesn't feel like enough recommendation. Maybe it is indeed a huge waste of time. But if it is, it isn't because it's encouraging people to substitute LLM use for reading.

imdsm · 25 days ago
commenter above probably didn't read the post, ironically
imdsm commented on Claude Cowork exfiltrates files   promptarmor.com/resources... · Posted by u/takira
c7b · a month ago
One thing that kind of baffles me about the popularity of tools like Claude Code is that their main target group seems to be developers (TUI interfaces, semi-structured instruction files,... not the kind of stuff I'd get my parents to use). So people who would be quite capable of building a simple agentic loop themselves [0]. It won't be quite as powerful as the commercial tools, but given that you deeply know how it works you can also tailor it to your specific problems much better. And sandbox it better (it baffles me that the tools' proposed solution to avoid wiping the entire disk is relying on user confirmation [1]).

It's like customizing your text editor or desktop environment. You can do it all yourself, you can get ideas and snippets from other people's setups. But fully relying on proprietary SaaS tools - that we know will have to get more expensive eventually - for some of your core productivity workflows seems unwise to me.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46545620

[1] https://www.theregister.com/2025/12/01/google_antigravity_wi...

imdsm · a month ago
For what it's worth, Cowork does run inside a sandbox
imdsm commented on ASCII Clouds   caidan.dev/portfolio/asci... · Posted by u/majkinetor
imdsm · a month ago
that looks pretty good
imdsm commented on UK Expands Online Safety Act to Mandate Preemptive Scanning   reclaimthenet.org/uk-expa... · Posted by u/aftergibson
imdsm · a month ago
> To meet the law’s demands, companies are expected to rely heavily on automated scanning systems, content detection algorithms, and artificial intelligence models trained to evaluate the legality of text, images, and videos in real time.

this means either devices need to evolve to do this locally, or the items need to be sent to external service providers, usually based outside of the UK, to scan them unencrypted

I also assume this means the government here in the UK are okay with all whatsapp messages they send to be sent to an LLM to scan them for legality, outside the UK?

imdsm commented on UK Expands Online Safety Act to Mandate Preemptive Scanning   reclaimthenet.org/uk-expa... · Posted by u/aftergibson
captain_coffee · a month ago
So wait - would this be something like... you trying to send a dickpic via WhateverMessenger, the content would be scanned first and you would be presented with a message along the lines of "This message cannot be sent as it violates our T&Cs"?
imdsm · a month ago
scanned locally or externally? that's what i care about
imdsm commented on CDC staff 'blindsided' as child vaccine schedule unilaterally overhauled   unmc.edu/healthsecurity/t... · Posted by u/stopbulying
imdsm · a month ago
100% agree with you on this. We have enough places for politics. This is meant to be hacker news.

u/imdsm

KarmaCake day3271May 19, 2013
About
CTO @ edge.network
View Original