You're conflation a bunch of things there
I can say, for example, entertainment weekly or the national enquirer is in poor taste but I didn't think they should be chased out of business
You're conflation a bunch of things there
I can say, for example, entertainment weekly or the national enquirer is in poor taste but I didn't think they should be chased out of business
Sometimes that's sex tapes and Epstein Island
It's ok. We're not going to resolve things here
2. Sure. Have a great time
2. freaky
You can see what this would look like already by searching for prnewswire https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqKQgKIiNDQklTRkFnTWF...
Companies pay to place those things and some outfits run them. It'd all look like that.
Anyways, journalist reach out for comment and are supposed to consider the response of the parties involved but that's about it.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43624536#43625085
It calls DOGE workers "wreckers" and it lists all the staffers related with the DOGE project with a detailed description of how they're related and what they've done recently. They even have a page just for revealing anonymous staffers in court documents: https://dogetrack.info/people/aliases/
I agree DOGE is destructive but is it productive to reveal all the names and history of every staffer, contractor, lawyer, etc... related to the DOGE project?
The above is why I see it as "biased and emotionally charged".
This website very well could've gone without the extensive list of people related. Which is why I see this as more of a harassment list.
Deleted Comment
He instead seems to make up a mental image of how a neural network might work on a computer and uses that representation instead.