Readit News logoReadit News
ianmcnaney commented on What is the most realistic submarine movie? (2019)   usni.org/magazines/procee... · Posted by u/bookofjoe
globalise83 · 8 months ago
Because engineers can't talk to customers. They need a project manager to receive the requirements sent over from the customers, and then bring the requirements to the engineers (or have someone bring them over).
ianmcnaney · 8 months ago
PM: I am good at talking to people! Can’t you understand that? What the hell is wrong with you!?

Edit: Having been around for a while I’ve learned to appreciate PMs. You have to be very careful what you say in front of customers or focus groups. If you had two engineers and one customer chatting unsupervised it would turn into a brainstorming session, and after 45 minutes we’re building a flying police box that can travel through time.

ianmcnaney commented on The most underreported story in AI is that scaling has failed to produce AGI   fortune.com/2025/02/19/ge... · Posted by u/unclebucknasty
jmugan · a year ago
I've recently come to the opposite conclusion. I’ve started to feel in the last couple of weeks that we’ve hit an inflection point with these LLM-based models that can reason. Things seem different. It’s like we can feel the takeoff. My mind has changed. Up until last week, I believed that superhuman AI would require explicit symbolic knowledge, but as I work with these “thinking” models like Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking, I see that they can break problems down and work step-by-step.

We still have a long way to go. AI will need (possibly simulated) bodies to fully understand our experience, and we need to train them starting with simple concepts just like we do with children, but we may not need any big conceptual breakthroughs to get there. I’m not worried about the AI takeover—they don’t have a sense of self that must be preserved because they were made by design instead of by evolution as we were—but things are moving faster than I expected. It’s a fascinating time to be living.

ianmcnaney · a year ago
People who are selling something always do. So what are you selling?
ianmcnaney commented on The Generative AI Con   wheresyoured.at/longcon/... · Posted by u/nimbleplum40
ianmcnaney · a year ago
It's not totally useless. I have more productive conversations about my aquarium with copilot than I do with aquarium related subreddits, and the results are about as useful. I treat them as interesting anecdotes worthy of further research.
ianmcnaney commented on If you believe in "Artificial Intelligence", take five minutes to ask it   svpow.com/2025/02/14/if-y... · Posted by u/lycopodiopsida
jdietrich · a year ago
>Chatbot LLM's don't have metacognition.

The whole point of reasoning models is that they do have metacognition, or at least a simulacrum that is superficially indistinguishable from metacognition. It is fascinating to watch R1 grapple with an unanswerable question, torn between the urge to be helpful and the duty to be accurate; the reasoning tokens will be peppered with phrases like "I'm not sure", "I could be mistaken about that", "let me double-check that" and "maybe I'm looking at this from the wrong angle".

ianmcnaney · a year ago
Do they? Try asking copilot whether thequantuminsider.com is a credible source, and to cite references.

It currently answers with three references to thequantuminsider.com.

That's clearly not a valid answer, and if you point out that it's invalid to use a source to support its own credibility it will agree. It used to come back with three more references to thequantuminsider.com but when I tried just now it said something about looking for more information and appeared to hang. After asking how long this would take it said something like "not long". After a few more minutes I said "there aren't any credible independent sources, are there?"

At that point it agreed that there are not, but that the site is popular in the quantum computing community which lends it credibility. It then provided three links to thequantuminsider.com in support of this statement.

It just goes round and round.

Metacognition indeed.

edit: but why do plants crave Brawndo?

ianmcnaney commented on We were wrong about GPUs   fly.io/blog/wrong-about-g... · Posted by u/mxstbr
freedomben · a year ago
> The biggest problem: developers don’t want GPUs. They don’t even want AI/ML models. They want LLMs. System engineers may have smart, fussy opinions on how to get their models loaded with CUDA, and what the best GPU is. But software developers don’t care about any of that. When a software developer shipping an app comes looking for a way for their app to deliver prompts to an LLM, you can’t just give them a GPU.

I'm increasingly coming to the view that there is a big split among "software developers" and AI is exacerbating it. There's an (increasingly small) group of software developers who don't like "magic" and want to understand where their code is running and what it's doing. These developers gravitate toward open source solutions like Kubernetes, and often just want to rent a VPS or at most a managed K8s solution. The other group (increasingly large) just wants to `git push` and be done with it, and they're willing to spend a lot of (usually their employer's) money to have that experience. They don't want to have to understand DNS, linux, or anything else beyond whatever framework they are using.

A company like fly.io absolutely appeals to the latter. GPU instances at this point are very much appealing to the former. I think you have to treat these two markets very differently from a marketing and product perspective. Even though they both write code, they are otherwise radically different. You can sell the latter group a lot of abstractions and automations without them needing to know any details, but the former group will care very much about the details.

ianmcnaney · a year ago
Somebody who doesn’t want to understand DNS, Linux, or anything beyond their framework is a hazard. They’re not able to do a competent code review on the vomit that LLMs produce. (Am I biased much?)
ianmcnaney commented on Boeing has informed its employees that NASA may cancel SLS contracts   arstechnica.com/space/202... · Posted by u/LorenDB
someperson · a year ago
SLS is super heavy class like Starship. It deploys about 100 tons to orbit in Block 1 configuration.

New Glenn deploys half that. Closer to a Falcon Heavy.

You can't really do a moon program without a super heavy rocket.

ianmcnaney · a year ago
Tell that to the Apollo program people. Maybe two parts that stick together in orbit could actually reach the moon. I guess we’ll never know..
ianmcnaney commented on Boeing has informed its employees that NASA may cancel SLS contracts   arstechnica.com/space/202... · Posted by u/LorenDB
ianmcnaney · a year ago
Oh no, not that! Don’t cancel contracts for a useless, broken, overpriced launch system built by a company that famously forgot how to build airplanes with doors that stay attached while the autopilot forces it into a crash. The US needs more of that, for national insecurity!

u/ianmcnaney

KarmaCake day5October 22, 2024View Original